Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — simon_

simon_

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 18, 2009, 12:55 AM UTC
HN karma
757
Public activity
144 items

About simon_

my first name (take the "_" off my hn username) + "esq" @ gmail

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #12613610

    Analyses on this topic are always so bad. Some counterpoints: (1) CEOs are intentionally aligned with shareholders, for good reason. Shareholders often make money due to luck, so e…

  2. comment
    Comment #11352947

    One might as well say: "20K+ fatalities on the Boko Haram insurgency, and counting, but you're up in arms about one maybe-murder in the most privileged city in the world." Not ever…

  3. comment
    Comment #10832121

    Sigh, it is hard for me to imagine that this comment was made in good faith. First of all, owning "free and clear" is hardly the expected meaning of ownership in the context of car…

  4. comment
    Comment #10752102

    It does. Big pharma constantly acquires research-focused junior companies to input into its pipeline for regulatory approval / commercialization.

  5. comment
    Comment #10599845

    Well, it is also the world of professors, grad students, administrators, etc. I know American culture is in love with undergrads and their "college experience", but I don't see why…

  6. comment
    Comment #10384291

    I would not write them off - my whole point is that by making the double argument people are trying to avoid having to think about trade offs. I get very suspicious when I see conj…

  7. comment
    Comment #10383746

    I am always annoyed by the argument that torture is unacceptable AND it doesn't work. It's not totally implausible that this is true, but I think it's very likely that torture "wor…

  8. comment
    Comment #10383444

    I think when he says "genuine", he means they are genuinely giving it a try, not that they are doing it out of pure spiritual authenticity. Most business decisions (and most decisi…

  9. comment
    Comment #9665766

    I won't presume to tell you that you've evaluated your situation fundamentally incorrectly. If you've come to this point, I doubt that hearing "there is always hope" is going to sw…

  10. comment
    Comment #9486719

    Yep, having ever had to make hard decisions in serious situations should definitely disqualify presidential hopefuls.

  11. comment
    Comment #9092362

    Not a non-sequitur. The point is that AirBnB landlords are being singled out as though their apartments "belong" in some sense on the market, when nobody cares much about the milli…

  12. comment
    Comment #9091308

    I guess all hotels are also guilty of "displacing New Yorkers" by re-purposing perfectly good real-estate for the benefit of "tourists"?

  13. comment
    Comment #9076083

    "Some researchers now say that as many as 1 person in 100 has some form of [atypical sex]." If the "simplistic" male/female binary explains >99% of observations, there does not see…

  14. comment
    Comment #9066983

    Ugh, this apology seems lamely antiseptic. "We are reviewing our notification procedures" is not the level of self-abasement I would expect after a mistake this serious.

  15. comment
    Comment #8987279

    Could someone weigh in on the following quote? Sounds fishy / wrong to me: To put this in perspective, a balloon that is one kilometer in diameter is capable of lifting about 700,0…

  16. comment
    Comment #8921180

    I really appreciate your response, but I think there is a problem with our mental model of a moral paragon. Is it really smart to believe that childlike simplicity of purpose is mo…

  17. comment
    Comment #8920097

    It is uncharitable and silly to believe that a good person could not have those positions in good faith. You may disagree with it, but "torture is sometimes permissible" is not an …

  18. comment
    Comment #8895248

    What you're saying is only true if you assume the existence of a modern test-prep mentality. Do the applicants know in advance which facts they will be asked to regurgitate, or do …

  19. comment
    Comment #8875397

    Yeah, the strength of field that would literally destroy molecules is a ridiculously loose upper bound.

  20. comment
    Comment #8710339

    Without saying anything about the broader thrust of an argument, I'll highlight a pet peeve: the drawing of wildly overconfident conclusions from social science research. The econo…

  21. comment
    Comment #8687411

    If we stipulate that the charter schools in question have strong selection biases in their student bodies and better resources relative to public schools, then: a) It's true that s…

  22. comment
    Comment #8339920

    Maybe, but I would wait to hear from a physicist. When I was a student, one of the most important papers one year was about a dark matter (WIMP) detector that failed to find anythi…

  23. comment
    Comment #8027619

    The year-long isolation seems to me like a much crueler part of the ordeal than anything food related. We consider it inhumane to do this to convicted murderers, even when they hav…

  24. comment
    Comment #7752246

    This is one example of a number of ways the article is weirdly disingenuous. Thea author compares returns to equities but risks to nothing, as you point out. Separately, when he ci…

  25. comment
    Comment #7627650

    The gap between the US and the rest of the West is clearly (if you look at the charts) closing due to rapid catch-up growth from the others, not decline in the US. Wouldn't it be k…