Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — silverwind

silverwind

HN member
Joined
Sat, Apr 06, 2013, 7:03 PM UTC
HN karma
820
Public activity
456 items

About silverwind

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49127858

    It's sad that such basic stuff took this long. If we're lucky we might even see a `Map` function in our lifetimes.

  2. comment
    Comment #49057748

    It's like 100 times slower than ruff. They had to massive caching techniques to get it to a remotely acceptable speed.

  3. comment
    Comment #49057724

    On problem of such go linters is they can only lint what the compiler sees so if you have multiple `build` tags, you need to run multiple lint passes. No other language's linter op…

  4. comment
    Comment #48842444

    Yes, tsconfig is a mess to scope. It needs a re-design to allow glob-based matching for all options and in typescript instead of jsonc.

  5. comment
    Comment #48828799

    Seems they not running these agents with the same permissions of the user prompting them, what a disaster.

  6. comment
    Comment #48762183

    I think tsdown is much better suited for CLI and library builds. Vite has many web-isms that don't matter for these.

  7. comment
    Comment #48333298

    Yeah, a missed opportunity. But I'm sure such a compiler will eventually arise.

  8. comment
    Comment #48243551

    True, sometimes a Claude answer is so on the spot, it'd a waste to not post it alongside your short summary.

  9. comment
    Comment #48181473

    PR spam is a major problems for repo that run bounties. Maybe GitHub should temporarily block accounts from raising PRs if like 95%+ of them are getting rejected.

  10. comment
    Comment #48155642

    Knowing them, I expect a release probably next week, have fun in production with it.

  11. comment
    Comment #48102819

    It'll always be a cat-and-mouse game. If npm adds protections, it'll only yield false-positives and workarounds will be trivial.

  12. comment
    Comment #48102136

    Almost all these recent compromises seem to involve either cache poisoning or prompt injection via untrusted variables.

  13. comment
    Comment #48102076

    Python had these too, no ecosystem is safe.

  14. comment
    Comment #48086468

    I think it's just a case of brain drain, followed by reckless AI adoption which both drove the quality down.

  15. comment
    Comment #48086306

    All those forks turned out to be inferior projects with substantially less contributions than the originals.

  16. comment
    Comment #48032164

    It's definitely helpful to know whether a PR was AI-assisted or not and the git attribution line is a simple and effective way of communicating that. I also recommend specifying mo…

  17. comment
    Comment #48030528

    I'm going even simpler, just bare docker with a idempotent bash wrapper.

  18. comment
    Comment #48013935

    I hope Node eventually gets a WebSocket server like Bun has.

  19. comment
    Comment #48013891

    Problem with Go is the type system is rudimentary, so you can't "restrict" AIs as well as you could in Typescript.

  20. comment
    Comment #48013863

    https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/#erasableSyntaxOnly covers them all, I strongly recommend running with that option enabled to be future-proof.

  21. comment
    Comment #48013846

    Modern Typescript does not need runtime features.

  22. comment
    Comment #47967673

    Maybe now people can stop blaming npm and realize none of these unreviewed package ecosystem are safe.

  23. comment
    Comment #47943373

    Could that be the explanation for the recently increased token use?

  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #47934419

    This seems nonsensical. Why would non-actions activity consume actions budget?