Viewing profile — silverwind
silverwind
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Apr 06, 2013, 7:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 820
- Public activity
- 456 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About silverwind
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49127858
It's sad that such basic stuff took this long. If we're lucky we might even see a `Map` function in our lifetimes.
-
comment
Comment #49057748
It's like 100 times slower than ruff. They had to massive caching techniques to get it to a remotely acceptable speed.
-
comment
Comment #49057724
On problem of such go linters is they can only lint what the compiler sees so if you have multiple `build` tags, you need to run multiple lint passes. No other language's linter op…
-
comment
Comment #48842444
Yes, tsconfig is a mess to scope. It needs a re-design to allow glob-based matching for all options and in typescript instead of jsonc.
-
comment
Comment #48828799
Seems they not running these agents with the same permissions of the user prompting them, what a disaster.
-
comment
Comment #48762183
I think tsdown is much better suited for CLI and library builds. Vite has many web-isms that don't matter for these.
-
comment
Comment #48333298
Yeah, a missed opportunity. But I'm sure such a compiler will eventually arise.
-
comment
Comment #48243551
True, sometimes a Claude answer is so on the spot, it'd a waste to not post it alongside your short summary.
-
comment
Comment #48181473
PR spam is a major problems for repo that run bounties. Maybe GitHub should temporarily block accounts from raising PRs if like 95%+ of them are getting rejected.
-
comment
Comment #48155642
Knowing them, I expect a release probably next week, have fun in production with it.
-
comment
Comment #48102819
It'll always be a cat-and-mouse game. If npm adds protections, it'll only yield false-positives and workarounds will be trivial.
-
comment
Comment #48102136
Almost all these recent compromises seem to involve either cache poisoning or prompt injection via untrusted variables.
-
comment
Comment #48102076
Python had these too, no ecosystem is safe.
-
comment
Comment #48086468
I think it's just a case of brain drain, followed by reckless AI adoption which both drove the quality down.
-
comment
Comment #48086306
All those forks turned out to be inferior projects with substantially less contributions than the originals.
-
comment
Comment #48032164
It's definitely helpful to know whether a PR was AI-assisted or not and the git attribution line is a simple and effective way of communicating that. I also recommend specifying mo…
-
comment
Comment #48030528
I'm going even simpler, just bare docker with a idempotent bash wrapper.
-
comment
Comment #48013935
I hope Node eventually gets a WebSocket server like Bun has.
-
comment
Comment #48013891
Problem with Go is the type system is rudimentary, so you can't "restrict" AIs as well as you could in Typescript.
-
comment
Comment #48013863
https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/#erasableSyntaxOnly covers them all, I strongly recommend running with that option enabled to be future-proof.
-
comment
Comment #48013846
Modern Typescript does not need runtime features.
-
comment
Comment #47967673
Maybe now people can stop blaming npm and realize none of these unreviewed package ecosystem are safe.
-
comment
Comment #47943373
Could that be the explanation for the recently increased token use?
-
comment
Comment #47935511
Slopilot
-
comment
Comment #47934419
This seems nonsensical. Why would non-actions activity consume actions budget?