Viewing profile — sigmar

>We are currently working closely with our inference partners and open-source maintainers to align the technical details and ensure the model can be reliably deployed across the ec…

Most of what an LLM does "could have" been done by a human if you throw enough human hours at it. But the reality in this circumstance is that a new tool helped find this leak. Say…

>Evaluators validate each tag individually — for example, protein, preparation, or health, individually rather than judging the item as a whole. Am I reading this right that the ju…

>I think it's reasonable for people to say, hey, if you're going to trash the reputation of Zig (in a pretend-objective way) what specifically is this referring to? Not aware of an…

To me, this addendum makes it worse. Making small edits to a post like this makes it seem like you're doubling down on the original resentful points, especially with all the new ju…

>One, this constant bullshit about some window closing, or the perpetual underclass, or falling hopelessly behind. This is negative valence hype, not only is it not true, it’s most…

Proven to be safe? Do you want a randomized trial? Do you demand that of every math tutorial video that goes up on YouTube?

How many years do you use them?

They don't make any specific claims about what conditions it will diagnose. At 16:30, he says they are only initially doing "body composition" because anything more would add 9+ mo…

that's an obsequious Altman, not their model being banned for being too good

I visited CERN last July. Was lucky enough to get into a group tour. The tour guide was a postdoc researcher who said the only times that public tours are allowed to take an elevat…

>publish these incredible papers explaining how they achieved their gains - something the American labs no longer do unfortunately. Google is still releasing a lot of llm architect…

The ATF was created by an act of congress. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968

>the language in the docs is awfully indirect. writes this^ and then proceeds to highlight a bold title from the docs that says "summarized thinking" that explains things clearly i…

Qualified it with "100%" because claude4 models show the first few lines of the chain of thought: >On Claude 4 models, the first few lines of thinking output are more verbose, prov…

Fable/mythos are the first models from anthropic that hide 100% of reasoning tokens. So it seems to me like we're about to get a lot more data about to what extent Chinese model pr…

>Some administration officials have said that a resolution should include an acknowledgment on Anthropic’s part that its rollout of Fable and communication with the White House cou…

I should have contextualized the quote- "chat is dead" is from an openai employee which was describing how they're shifting focus to more agentic consumer products, and putting les…

I like that "chat is dead" framing I heard recently because too many people are having interpersonal relations with these LLMs and want to tune their "emotions"/tone. Humanity woul…

All science-based conclusions come with uncertainty. Only ideologues (and siths) write in absolute terms.

Wacky decision. I know they want ads but it's an endurance sport! Imagine if they chopped a sport like 10km run into quarters.

Did you read the blog post where they explained why there was a temporary block on all biology-related questions?

Who foots the bill?