Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sigbottle

sigbottle

HN member
Joined
Thu, Aug 11, 2022, 2:45 AM UTC
HN karma
401
Public activity
361 items

About sigbottle

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49225235

    I mean, I think the point is, every discipline isn't ever that discipline in a vacuum, it touches the real world, and we build meta-structures around said things that may not look …

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #49203090

    To be fair, Ghidra was released in 2019 and in general knowledge was still hard to find even back in 2010 I feel (well, compared to 2026 in the age of AI)

  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #49167313

    Blame Descartes? I don't know. Extended theories of cognition all get shot down, even analytic philosophers who are accused of being more "continental" still primarily hold mind-bo…

  6. comment
    Comment #49160068

    Yooo is this the CMU funny guy?

  7. comment
    Comment #49136615

    Is irc still a thing nowadays? My dream is to find some niche 25 person irc channel and just shoot the shit at 3am lol.

  8. comment
    Comment #49130634

    I personally think that this kind of behavior is necessary, unavoidable, and actually good for society, precisely because no one has access to this thing called "rationality", if i…

  9. comment
    Comment #49130549

    I don't directly interpret Camus, but I think to my interpretation of Dostoevsky's underground man. He knows he's irrational, can "rationally prove" he's irrational, yet still live…

  10. comment
    Comment #49127430

    XY problem, don't expand the design doc before you have the idea for the design. Don't compile down into lower abstraction levels until necessary

  11. comment
    Comment #49125654

    A lot of bias here around non-extended theories of cognition. We're already well past the point of trying to correspond the internal "brain chemistry" of an LLM to a thing called "…

  12. comment
    Comment #49125525

    I can't tell if you're joking or not, but this is a legit position and I don't think it's that crazy. The alternative is to posit that you know the True Definition of thinking, whi…

  13. comment
    Comment #49113384

    I looked this up, and sure enough, Ernst Mach was the one who lead the charge (a self proclaimed positivist, which is a position that many scientists would gladly say they support)…

  14. comment
    Comment #49109234

    Yeah I have my own forks for it, it's just annoying since usually I want to just install things on a machine and just "have it work". Mosh is also extra annoying because it depends…

  15. comment
    Comment #49100660

    Looking really cynically, it does seem like it might transition into some kind of cloud-development situation. Your "one access to all development" is one ssh away from our mega 24…

  16. comment
    Comment #49100392

    I feel like the main benefit of such a thing would be centralization. Part of the issue with the terminal ecosystem is precisely that everything's so fragmented and everybody needs…

  17. comment
    Comment #49091213

    Yeah I remember being in sophomore year of college, watching Anders Hejlsberg's video on "the new way to build compilers" or something and having my mind blown. But I only ever loo…

  18. comment
    Comment #49090000

    I've always thought this was fascinating, but the only incremental compilation I knew was obscure programming languages and Rust. Oh yeah, I guess Roslyn? Really fun and fascinatin…

  19. comment
    Comment #49069177

    The more technical you get, the more subsitutable you become - or at least, people think of it in that way, because the whole idea is "It's not me, or the people, it's the raw tech…

  20. comment
    Comment #49063183

    To further onto this, humans could technically simulate Turing machines themselves but they don't. Efficiency and finding the right abstractions and tradeoffs is literally identica…

  21. comment
    Comment #49062988

    Following this. my plan has been to start simple and eventually build out the inference stack piece by piece, however simple. Take some open weights model and from first principles…

  22. comment
    Comment #49062895

    I'm curious if it's possible in general for an AI to achieve this without some evolutionary forcing function that actually threatens their "biology". Not talking about prompting Cl…

  23. comment
    Comment #49054416

    Do people actually do systems design with control theory? I know the authoritative question to possibility - yes, my company does it. But I'm wondering about say, an industry stand…

  24. comment
    Comment #49039925

    This is how it is with all of these guys, their only principle is "what's good for me", and will twist all narratives to fit it

  25. comment
    Comment #49021282

    I will readily admit that I didn't read Dostoevsky, and I don't continue to read Dostoevsky, because I've compared him against a swath of other fiction writers and authoritatively …