Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — siegel

siegel

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 19, 2017, 2:46 AM UTC
HN karma
71
Public activity
177 items

About siegel

Startup Attorney Grellas Shah LLP http://www.grellas.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-siegel-a271265/

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #39531329

    This is a tough question to answer based on these facts. But my first question is this: you "incorporated the company in late January." Ok, but what did you and she actually sign? …

  2. comment
    Comment #39256263

    Over the past few years, mass arbitrations have become an imperfect way for consumers to get relief where there is an arbitration provision with a class action waiver. Unfortunatel…

  3. comment
    Comment #39256146

    You need someone to look at your consulting agreement. This is largely about IP ownership. Happy to take a quick look if that's helpful.

  4. comment
    Comment #39256130

    What type of co-founder agreement is this? I'm at a bit of loss as to what he, as CEO, is really contributing here. But that aside, it's completely unclear what the terms are. If y…

  5. comment
    Comment #39186328

    Have you practiced with anyone you trust and respect? Self-assessment in interviewing skills is really difficult. You need feedback about how you are actually coming off. Oh, and t…

  6. comment
    Comment #39135812

    I wouldn't say the complications themselves are intentional. But take a look at a typical Series A. There are 5 core documents. Dozens and dozens of pages of legalese. I'm a lawyer…

  7. comment
    Comment #39114002

    What type of startup are you running? Is this a SaaS product? As someone who does a lot of startup contracting (focusing on SaaS, but not exclusively at all), this is a bit surpris…

  8. comment
    Comment #39099805

    Well, that's of limited value if there are two founders, no other shareholders, and equal ownership. It's just deadlock, unfortunately.

  9. comment
    Comment #39072259

    I work with quite a few company with dual class voting common shares. I will never understand the notion of not implementing that at incorporation if you want it. Will you have the…

  10. comment
    Comment #39051891

    1x IS a liquidation preference. I very, very rarely see in excess of a 1x liquidation preference, regardless of the round.

  11. comment
    Comment #39051888

    On the last point, that is why it is CRITICAL that you do not give your investors the right to demand registration based on the mere lapse of time. In most rounds I do, I get inves…

  12. comment
    Comment #39051868

    Or they would get their money back, in the alternative. Depends on what's better for the SAFE holder.

  13. comment
    Comment #39009688

    Part of this depends on what your plan is with the company. If you intend to seek VC funding, vesting is going to be renegotiated. Will your co-founder even agree to that? I am con…

  14. comment
    Comment #38964222

    Yes, it is easy to take advantage of...And easy to blow. So, something to be careful about. But hugely valuable. Is your company a C corp?

  15. comment
    Comment #38964164

    Yes, you can apply to VC alone. Some investors want to see a founding team. Some don't care. But other than the desire to a have a co-founder in theory or to secure investment, why…

  16. comment
    Comment #38964042

    This is not 100% accurate from a trademark perspective, at least with respect to "famous" marks. Generally speaking, you are correct - unless there is a likelihood of consumer conf…

  17. comment
    Comment #38942278

    I think "privacy" here is the wrong word. Carta owes some obligations to companies that sign up or their services (though they are vague and ambiguous). But I hope people wake up t…

  18. comment
    Comment #38942186

    That's nice that they are leaving the secondary trading business. Of course, they can restart that business again. But this all begs two questions: 1) Do their legal agreements pro…

  19. comment
    Comment #38942120

    We have a lot of clients who happily use Pulley. I believe they are a YC company themselves. I don't have a dog in this fight. But there are plusses and minuses to these various so…

  20. comment
    Comment #37044505

    That's not universally true. For most marks, you are right. But for certain particularly "famous" marks, the owner has a potential cause of action for dilution of the owner's mark.…

  21. comment
    Comment #36993695

    I'm assuming they mean from the owners of the Nerf brand of foam toys (I think owned by Hasbro nowadays). They could attempt to argue that NerfStudio dilutes the Nerf mark. Not nec…

  22. comment
    Comment #36993669

    If the consumer sues in small claims court, then the company would need to petition the court to compel arbitration. Large companies (like Apple) sometimes expend what would seem l…

  23. story
    What's the Deal with Non-Disparagement Provisions?

    As a startup attorney, I see a huge number of employee agreements with non-disparagement provisions. I’m curious about people’s experience with these provisions, particularly in Ca…

  24. comment
    Comment #34689365

    As an attorney who deals with responding to (and, well, also drafting) letters like this, I think LinkedIn may very well go away if you remove any reference to LinkedIn from your w…

  25. comment
    Comment #34688713

    To some extent, it isn't that different from how you raised funds for your prior startups (assuming you did). And, in fact, you might very well want to start with the investors you…