Viewing profile — sidhu1f
sidhu1f
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 17, 2014, 1:12 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sidhu1f
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25453155
For the heavy lifting of the actual linear algebra computations, these tensor computation libraries typically use some variant of BLAS or eigen.
-
comment
Comment #24242249
There was a time when GCC had to be installed by compiling from source. Doing so involved compiling the GCC source with the native compiler, and then using the resulting binary to …
-
comment
Comment #23959402
See https://www.planetcom.co.uk
-
comment
Comment #17228185
Wouldn't GPL v3 be as effective as AGPL in this context?
-
comment
Comment #17121153
My statement (as can be seen from its GP post) uses convenience to mean ease of use, not in the titles available sense that you (and the two following posts) do.
-
comment
Comment #17119110
Is BitTorrent more convenient than Netflix?
-
comment
Comment #17099438
Top of the line Arria-10 FPGAs have about 1500 floating point MACs [1]. Using such a device, Intel claims ~1 TFLOP sustained for GEMM, the standard matrix multiply operation [2]. […
-
comment
Comment #17013628
Even calling them Hindu-Arabic would be preferable to the usual custom of labeling them simply Arabic (for e.g. in LaTeX).
- story
-
comment
Comment #17002700
Some of Mcron's innovations[1]: > The new idea is to read the required command instructions, work out which command needs to be executed next, and then sleep until the inferred tim…
-
comment
Comment #16241887
Modern alternatives to BIND that I have had good (though limited) experience with: - unbound (recursive resolver) https://www.unbound.net - nsd (authoritative server) https://www.n…
-
comment
Comment #12500458
The GNU Artanis[1] web framework seems interesting... [1] http://web-artanis.com
- story
-
comment
Comment #11915114
Not exactly, ME even without AMT is scary[1]. [1] https://libreboot.org/faq/#intelme
-
comment
Comment #11845554
A majority (if not most) of the contributions to the Linux kernel come from developers paid to do so by the likes of Intel, Google, IBM etc. [1]. Do you have any reason to believe …
-
comment
Comment #11843406
What makes you so sure that, had the GNU stack been BSD/MIT licensed and as popular, that Microsoft etc. would not have come out with products featuring the same software but with …
-
comment
Comment #11759646
Well, as per the coreboot docs [1], the panic level is only 9000+... [1] https://www.coreboot.org/Binary_situation#Intel
-
comment
Comment #8329770
There are some sound technical reasons for choosing scheme: http://wingolog.org/archives/2011/08/30/the-gnu-extension-la...