Viewing profile — shdjhdfh
shdjhdfh
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 24, 2023, 9:09 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About shdjhdfh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46417454
This was killed in the recent budget bill: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/13/congress-thc-hemp-ban.html
-
comment
Comment #45905712
The highest bitrate UHD Blu-ray supports is 144mbit/s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_HD_Blu-ray . A one gigabit NIC is not even close to the biggest compromise on this system…
-
comment
Comment #45651928
You should assume it will not work unless you test it regularly. That's a big part of why having active/active multi-region is attractive, even though it's much more complex.
-
comment
Comment #44665194
My guess is that skywhopper is correct. We're only able to see the tail end of the attack, but the repo was likely compromised in some way.
-
comment
Comment #44664129
Another thing to note, the AI angle on this is nonsensical. The commit could have just as easily done many other negative things to the system without AI as a layer of indirection.…
-
comment
Comment #44664024
Your article breathlessly blames AWS for being reckless while having no real facts about the compromise. The whole thing reads like click bait.
-
comment
Comment #44663967
Ah, I think it might have been this, which was reverted and seems to have been pushed directly to master: https://github.com/aws/aws-toolkit-vscode/commit/678851bbe97...
-
comment
Comment #44663905
The prompt 404 quotes in the article doesn't appear to exist anywhere in the git history for the repo they point to. It seems unlikely that Amazon would rewrite git history to hide…
-
comment
Comment #35295554
It is encrypted at rest: https://github.blog/changelog/2019-05-23-git-data-encryption...