Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — shdjhdfh

shdjhdfh

HN member
Joined
Fri, Mar 24, 2023, 9:09 PM UTC
HN karma
32
Public activity
9 items

About shdjhdfh

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46417454

    This was killed in the recent budget bill: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/13/congress-thc-hemp-ban.html

  2. comment
    Comment #45905712

    The highest bitrate UHD Blu-ray supports is 144mbit/s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_HD_Blu-ray . A one gigabit NIC is not even close to the biggest compromise on this system…

  3. comment
    Comment #45651928

    You should assume it will not work unless you test it regularly. That's a big part of why having active/active multi-region is attractive, even though it's much more complex.

  4. comment
    Comment #44665194

    My guess is that skywhopper is correct. We're only able to see the tail end of the attack, but the repo was likely compromised in some way.

  5. comment
    Comment #44664129

    Another thing to note, the AI angle on this is nonsensical. The commit could have just as easily done many other negative things to the system without AI as a layer of indirection.…

  6. comment
    Comment #44664024

    Your article breathlessly blames AWS for being reckless while having no real facts about the compromise. The whole thing reads like click bait.

  7. comment
    Comment #44663967

    Ah, I think it might have been this, which was reverted and seems to have been pushed directly to master: https://github.com/aws/aws-toolkit-vscode/commit/678851bbe97...

  8. comment
    Comment #44663905

    The prompt 404 quotes in the article doesn't appear to exist anywhere in the git history for the repo they point to. It seems unlikely that Amazon would rewrite git history to hide…

  9. comment
    Comment #35295554

    It is encrypted at rest: https://github.blog/changelog/2019-05-23-git-data-encryption...