Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — shatteredgate

shatteredgate

HN member
Joined
Wed, Dec 15, 2021, 2:28 PM UTC
HN karma
62
Public activity
96 items

About shatteredgate

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #29668695

    >Do you have any idea of how much money is lost on scams via Western Union? Or how much money companies spend on fraudulent ad views? Insurance fraud? I'm fully aware, that's why I…

  2. comment
    Comment #29668133

    >And if the person is not honest, all it will take is for a few people to lose a small amount of money which is simply not worth fighting for, but it is enough to get those victims…

  3. comment
    Comment #29667861

    Not really, with Linux it's the same as it would be in BSD if they wanted to avoid conflicts with GPL. You put that code in an optional module and have the user compile it. I am un…

  4. comment
    Comment #29667790

    >You can add an escrow system or even use a reputation-based approach as a way to manage fraud, but the idea is that it is optional. If all you want is to buy some cheap and fast c…

  5. comment
    Comment #29667171

    I can't see how that is the point, I honestly don't understand what cryptocurrency provides there at all. I've seen nothing about it that suggests it has some kind of novel solutio…

  6. comment
    Comment #29666190

    >Should we be telling all the sex workers and adult entertainers that we should be better at "building trust" Given that the reason there was controversy around OnlyFans was becaus…

  7. comment
    Comment #29664155

    That has not been my experience. The issues are with licenses other than BSD but that's the same in Linux; Linux can also use BSD code, a lot of Linux code is actually dual license…

  8. comment
    Comment #29662758

    Docker wasn't dead 5 or 6 years ago when I heard about this. In my experience some things are easier to implement in Linux and some are easier to implement in BSD. I don't particul…

  9. comment
    Comment #29661608

    Sorry, then I must be remembering some other issue. The effort to port docker to BSD seems to have disappeared. >And yes, having to use root is a major issue. Looks fixable though.…

  10. comment
    Comment #29661420

    FWIW I think the goal has been to put security in some other layer that's more appropriate. You can add those type of APIs to Wayland but you'd have to also implement a security me…

  11. comment
    Comment #29658347

    Side note: I suppose you could chroot to /.

  12. comment
    Comment #29658278

    >conflates the X protocol and Xlib which nobody was using to write new software even back then. They are mostly synonymous, there is a large amount of software using Xlib that will…

  13. comment
    Comment #29658129

    Any mechanism that allows you to listen to hotkeys at will is about as insecure as running a program as root that snoops keys; either way you're vulnerable to keyloggers. The X imp…

  14. comment
    Comment #29658058

    This comment isn't really correct all, it's not possible to do that with the architecture of X. The best you can get is XSecurity and its related extensions, anything more than tha…

  15. comment
    Comment #29658006

    Open source doesn't really work like that, there is no top-down decision maker setting priorities for what should be done in any given distribution. Usually what happens is you wai…

  16. comment
    Comment #29657643

    I don't see why. BSD and GPL are equally compatible, it doesn't matter which way you go. I can see why they wouldn't want a GPL component to be mandatory but it can be made an opti…

  17. comment
    Comment #29657608

    A lot of the various security options in systemd: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.exe... The sandboxing and mount-related ones are implemented with namespa…

  18. comment
    Comment #29657597

    Not anymore, unprivileged user namespaces make it so you don't have to do that. That's how podman's "rootless containers" are able to work.

  19. comment
    Comment #29657191

    In my experience, both Linux developers and BSD developers don't seem to care too much about porting things to the other's operating system. If you want to do things the Linux way …

  20. comment
    Comment #29657169

    I haven't tested runj but just from looking at it, it seems it is not fully compatible with everything that runc does because the OCI itself specifies a lot of Linux-specific funct…

  21. comment
    Comment #29657017

    >Yes, the Linux API seems more flexible, but when you think about it, it really isn't, because all the models that actually make any sense can be implemented using simpler interfac…

  22. comment
    Comment #29656976

    I'm using them for several things but the most straightforward one is probably that namespacing can be gradually added to services, you most likely see benefits from this already i…

  23. comment
    Comment #29656163

    You can just compare the APIs, namespaces are like the individual components of a jail. You can use them to build something like a jail, or something different that has a different…

  24. comment
    Comment #29654666

    >The attitude exhibited by GTK and GNOME developers on their issue trackers and the unstable nature of KDE apps on Wayland has made me cynical about GUI on Linux. I think you're mi…

  25. comment
    Comment #29652828

    And all the other ones: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/namespaces.7.html BSD jails are similar but not quite the same thing.