Viewing profile — shaldengeki
shaldengeki
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 12, 2011, 10:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 272
- Public activity
- 73 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About shaldengeki
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46043702
> Is anyone really using bazel outside Google in any meaningful capacity? Yes. For instance, Stripe uses Bazel internally for ~all of its builds. https://stripe.com/blog/fast-secur…
-
comment
Comment #45369679
I appreciate your position, but the record is pretty clear; his actions clearly meet Berkeley's own definition of research misconduct.
-
comment
Comment #45355947
You may be interested to read that the Why We Sleep guy committed research misconduct in the book. Guy is totally unrepentant about it. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/…
-
comment
Comment #45160421
HN's moderation team has been pretty clear that generated comments aren't welcome here. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
-
comment
Comment #45066231
I don't see any network analysis on this page. What network analysis do you see? I do see generic statements like "boosting each other", and I see vaguely-drawn lines in the primar…
-
comment
Comment #45010120
Further in the thread, the guy notes that this isn't "new" mathematics - a better proof with tighter bounds was published in April: https://xcancel.com/SebastienBubeck/status/19581…
-
comment
Comment #44883675
Should be in the first, not seventh paragraph: this was a survey of 19 doctors, who performed ~1400 colonoscopies.
-
comment
Comment #44483552
This shows a huge surge starting in 2023. I see you're counting all .AI TLDs; how much is this responsible for the surge? I think .AI TLD registrations took off starting in 2023, a…
- story
-
comment
Comment #44439591
I think it's important to clarify that it's just audio and video that are E2EE, not text messages themselves. (You may have meant this, but "channels" was a little ambiguous.)
-
comment
Comment #44372791
Yes, that's correct. The authors themselves are being extremely careful (and, I'd argue, misleading) in their wording. The right way to interpret those words is "this is literally …
-
comment
Comment #44372538
No, you're wrong. They wrote the story before coming up with the model! In fact the model and technical work has basically nothing to do with the short story, aka the part that eve…
-
comment
Comment #44333532
> One of the AI 2027 authors joked to me in the comments on a recent article that “you may not like it but it's what peak AI forecasting performance looks like”. Well, I don’t like…
-
comment
Comment #44187939
This strikes me as disingenuous: > I like when my software gets used by a lot of people and people send me nice emails. In this case, people weren't sending me the nicest emails, u…
- story
-
comment
Comment #43563163
This is an extremely minor point, but: > significant parts of our federal government have abandoned key precepts of outcome-driven problem-solving. (Just try navigating the IRS’ Fr…
- story
-
comment
Comment #42755353
The title here buries the lede, IMO. Quoting from Epoch AI in the thread: > We were restricted from disclosing the partnership until around the time o3 launched [...] Our contract …
-
comment
Comment #42363808
I don't think this article, or the underlying claims, are (yet) credible. I'm disappointed that the Washington Post wrote about this at all, and that people I respect a lot have am…
-
comment
Comment #42337872
Here's a 14 year-old series showing that providers are the biggest chunk of the overspending in the system: https://web.archive.org/web/20210421025041/http://theinciden...
-
comment
Comment #41471290
Their commitment to open source, however, might go. Quite recently Google quietly unshipped an effort to make their protobuf build rules more useful to OSS users of Bazel (see the …
-
comment
Comment #40804803
The Internet Archive shows the progression of events pretty clearly. - In ~May 2023, the FT transferred it to Jake Champion: https://web.archive.org/web/20230505112634/https://poly…
- story
-
comment
Comment #39112944
As someone who attended before and after the change: there was certainly no immediate effect. The consensus at the time (at least amongst my little circle of friends) was that adop…
-
comment
Comment #39044304
I agree with the general thrust of this, but it's worth noting that the author does _slightly_ better than is typical for LLM-based analyses: they released the dataset of book-labe…