Viewing profile — shadowsun7
shadowsun7
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 13, 2010, 7:02 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,472
- Public activity
- 493 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About shadowsun7
Sporadic Internet writer.
I use Go, Python, Ruby, Javascript, Java, and PHP, and in that order.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41959055
This comment is for HN readers who might be interested in solutions. My two questions (a) and (b) were not rhetorical. Let’s get concrete. a) You are advising a company to “check b…
-
comment
Comment #41958493
If you are interested in these ideas, you should know that this essay kicks off a series of essays that culminates, a year later, with an examination of the Amazon-style Weekly Bus…
-
comment
Comment #41958450
And how are you going to tell that when you have a) variation (that is, every metric wiggles wildly)? And also b) how are you able to tell if it has or hasn’t impacted other parts …
-
comment
Comment #41958348
I should note that this essay kicks off an entire series that eventually culminates in a detailed examination of the Amazon Weekly Business Review (which takes some time to get to …
-
comment
Comment #41958246
This is accurate. https://xmrit.com/articles/gift-exceptional-variation/
-
comment
Comment #39639621
What would you say if I told you Bryar has lots of stories of this style of thinking applied in early Amazon? This is pre-AWS Amazon, mind you — where they were trying to figure ou…
-
comment
Comment #39639515
To be fair to OP, Wheeler never claims that for stable/in-control/predictable processes roughly half of the measurements will lie above the average. The only claim he makes is that…
-
comment
Comment #39639490
So I've got a dumb question here: what happens when you use vanilla XmR charts with J-curve shaped or sub-exponential distributions? My current simplistic (and very dumb!) solution…
-
comment
Comment #39639321
A couple of quick notes, from someone who has actually put this to practice — and in a non-manufacturing context, to boot! (From a brief reading of this thread, it seems like kqr, …
-
comment
Comment #39618240
I believe you may enjoy this, which takes SPC methods and extrapolates from it an entire path to becoming data driven: https://commoncog.com/becoming-data-driven-first-principles/
-
comment
Comment #36813205
Author here. Previous time this was on the front page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30930985 As an update, I temporarily relocated to a different city and spent four months…
-
comment
Comment #32848137
Yes, rest assured the previous article talks about exactly this. (I mean, the title of this piece should give you a hint: “Pay attention to deviations from mainstream incentives” b…
-
comment
Comment #32326837
Discourse is one of the best pieces of software I've ever used — I self-host, and it's never given me any problems. There's built-in backups to S3, I can upgrade the software 80% o…
-
comment
Comment #32161558
This is actually predicted by the COR developmental model presented in the article. The terminology might be a bit wonky, but the basic idea is that ‘loss’ produces a stress respon…
-
comment
Comment #32022214
> In response, some folk back into the weak form of the argument. The weak form is what you get when you hear someone say “history doesn’t repeat itself, but it rhymes” — that is, …
-
comment
Comment #31302163
The problem is that Dr Ung walks back certain elements of his report, as is summarised in the final judgment: > the High Court found that the appellant had borderline intellectual …
-
comment
Comment #31301722
I'd actually urge you to look into the details of the case — Nagaenthran had two psychiatrists and a psychologist evaluate him on separate occasions, each of them certifying that h…
-
comment
Comment #30944022
Author here. Quite the contrary, actually — I’ve read all the above sources. On top of that, with the exception of Chambliss (which is a landmark work, to be clear), and Dreyfus (w…
-
comment
Comment #29535722
I disagree with this assessment. (Or, more accurately, I’d like to see a more comprehensive counter argument). The article you link to is essentially a response to 2 pages in the b…
-
comment
Comment #29532704
Readers who are interested in the actionable aspects of this topic should probably read the last instalment in this series: https://commoncog.com/blog/accelerated-expertise/ The ba…
-
comment
Comment #28782945
This is an interesting question! The answer is to hold conclusions loosely and test; always test. One way to pick who to pay attention to is ‘believability’ — meaning that you list…
-
comment
Comment #28781882
Ok, since I have to spell it out for you: I have not included any such theories because I have not found them useful. The links are to say something simple: my entire epistemology …
-
comment
Comment #28775423
https://commoncog.com/blog/the-hierarchy-of-practical-eviden... I would ask the OP a simple question: what organisations have they built, and where are they now? Longer, but establ…
- story
-
comment
Comment #28458015
I would recommend the series first — AE assumes familiarity with the recognition primed decision making model (or RPD) which I cover in the series. If you want to read books to pre…