Viewing profile — sfrank
sfrank
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 23, 2012, 8:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 18
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sfrank
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30409016
So, like Delaware?
-
comment
Comment #24716804
Like iterate ( https://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/ )
-
comment
Comment #18967144
For automotive software the ISO 26262 is the equivalent to RTCA DO-178 in avionics. ISO 26262 highly recommends that ASIL C and D-classified systems utilize semiformal and formal v…
-
comment
Comment #18967106
That is because the formal method supplement of the DO-178C is RTCA DO-333. There you have about a hundred pages concerned with the application of formal methods.
-
comment
Comment #16780004
And what the OPAL functional language [1] did since the mid 80s. Though the concept there is expanded from simple reference counting by additional static analysis during compile ti…
-
comment
Comment #14244559
No, a domain-consistent all-different propagator such as the one desccribed in [1] is sufficient to determine a valuation domain for a Sudoku puzzle without any search. Of course t…
-
comment
Comment #12976067
Yes, but even better there is the global constraint geost [1] which is specifically for this purpose in k-dimensions; see also [2] for a more detailed presentation. Unfortunately, …
-
comment
Comment #9570747
The DO-178B/C explicitly does not specify how verification is done but describes the properties that are expected of the verification evidences that you submit to the certification…
-
comment
Comment #5704043
Sure you can do however, since Ruby allows destructive updates, why not use one of the established/traditional imperative data structures and then apply techniques to make them "pe…
-
comment
Comment #4015184
Well, not my area, but a little googling brought up this: http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/cellier/MS/andres_ms.pdf (well, there goes my evening). I don't know, but I find the decom…
-
comment
Comment #4015073
Well, since both are implementations of the Modelica standard I would guess they are pretty much the same, though I do not know MapleSim or your problems with it.
-
comment
Comment #4015053
This is simply a different view to model systems such as can be done in Simulink. Simulink has a (differential) equation-centric view whereas Modelica (of which SystemModeller is a…