Viewing profile — setnone

LLMs don't have legs yet. If you're smart but can't touch things you only keep being smart

i was being cautious, but yes - 10 hours a day and much much more annoyances to finally achieve the perfect decimal metric system

optimum number is obviously decimal: 10 days a week, 10 month a year, 20 hours a day

yeah this feels frustrating with claude, a black box inside a black box. good thing they got competitors

i just need one more, the last one, i swear

yes, it goes naturally most of the time, i also say good job and don't hold my thoughts if the job is bad

the greater equalizer has arrived, lost passion is still up for an individual but with paying the bills i naively expect some economic breakthrough from humans+ai

the only ai device that makes any sense is a robot

like others said in the thread: much less drama and i'll add much less attitude from the company and the models, overall i'm having much calmer experience with codex, hope it stays…

> It lets you easily track and visualize how you use Claude, and decide whether that time aligns with your goals. i haven't yet encountered/achieved ai summarization technique nuan…

very well done, never knew i needed this. thanks for sharing!

words like 'inequality' and 'defected' tell me theese are ideologically charged expectations which might be the root cause of your disapointment

non-invasive tech from meta? i don't buy that

Hi HN, just want to rant and see if anybody can relate. The product is not the same as i signed up for few month ago and the same shift i've experienced with Claude Code on Opus 4.…

the grooming (marketing) game is strong with anthropic

a mistery indeed

Is it intelligent then? Is it accountable? Is it responsible? Artificially, perhaps

cool! i see at least two reasons in the title to upvote this

my take it's because of the naming: Amodei, Claude and Mythos have this money-throwing vibe to it

if you go this route don't hold your thoughts on the casino itself

Claude's 4.6 - 4.7 transition made me discover codex, and with gpt 5.5 there is no way i'm going back

bunch of Tells HN incoming...

> they will usually provide extremely useful information bold claim, they'll provide bunch of words for sure like in this particular tool's response

absolutely agree: non-1M Opus 4.6 on x20 max was peak AGI now it's back to regular slop and just to check otherwise i have to spend at least $100