Viewing profile — sestinj
sestinj
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 11:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 450
- Public activity
- 108 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sestinj
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47054080
Actually very similar, GitHub was also early in talking about Continuous AI. I think the biggest difference is that Continue is very focused on the use case of checks and gets a lo…
-
comment
Comment #47050944
just saw the follow up questions: - we do! right now you can export some metrics as images, or share a link publicly to the broader dashboard. will be curious if others are interes…
-
comment
Comment #47050858
I think this is a good summary! And the configurable part turns out to be the main bit One of the fundamental differences between checks and code review bots is that you trade brea…
-
comment
Comment #47050676
That's us! I figure others will wonder the same, so we wrote about what exactly we're doing here: https://blog.continue.dev/from-extension-to-mission-control tl;dr - a _lot_ of peo…
-
story
Show HN: Continue – Source-controlled AI checks, enforceable in CI
We now write most of our code with agents. For a while, PRs piled up, causing review fatigue, and we had this sinking feeling that standards were slipping. Consistency is tough at …
- job
-
comment
Comment #44438253
Continue | ONSITE - San Francisco | Full-time | https://continue.dev Continue is building an open-source AI code assistant along with a hub of models, rules, and tools. Our VS Code…
-
comment
Comment #44162806
Continue | ONSITE - San Francisco | Full-time | https://continue.dev Continue is building an open-source AI code assistant along with a hub of models, rules, and tools. Our VS Code…
-
comment
Comment #43506579
If you're a user of .cursorrules or .windsurfrules, then there's a lot of great content at https://hub.continue.dev/explore/rules . They don't yet support assistant files directly …
-
comment
Comment #43501346
We want Continue to always be free for individuals, and we layer on features for teams and enterprises to make money. There’s much more detail on our pricing page: https://hub.cont…
-
comment
Comment #43499253
I'm sorry you ran into problems repeatedly, and couldn't agree more. As much as we've aimed to innovate on customization, it does not have to be an either/or. We recognized this, h…
-
comment
Comment #43499185
Ooh +1 to both of these. We use shadcn as well :) and have been leveraging these docs: https://hub.continue.dev/vercel/shadcn-ui-docs , but there should totally be more in-depth ru…
-
comment
Comment #43499166
It looks like people have created a few already: https://hub.continue.dev/search?q=flutter I think it would be great to have one on the front page as well if there's something you …
-
comment
Comment #43497671
We didn't claim to be covered by AP, but I see what you mean: the previous text ("Learn more on TechCrunch and The Associated Press") wasn't clear enough. We've updated it to say “…
-
comment
Comment #43496819
Totally, I actually think this would make for a really great custom assistant, probably even something we'd feature on the front page: https://hub.continue.dev/explore/assistants Y…
-
comment
Comment #43496810
Rules are a subset of what we've allowed you to do on the Hub (and an important one). There are other building blocks, like models, MCP servers, docs, prompts, data, and more. We w…
-
comment
Comment #43496796
thanks!
-
comment
Comment #43496789
I hear this often (I had the same gut reaction before thinking below the surface) and will share why I think that our bet is perfectly aligned with the Bitter Lesson being true 1. …
-
comment
Comment #43496365
Fix is released! Thanks for catching this so early Should now be able to remix PyTorch rules for example: https://hub.continue.dev/starter/pytorch-rules/remix
-
comment
Comment #43496334
I wouldn't say that's free-loader behavior :) It's exactly what we want to make possible—if you have strong reason to use your own models (price, convenience, security, remaining l…
-
comment
Comment #43496298
:D thank you!!
-
comment
Comment #43496292
wow that was fast—some gems in there
-
comment
Comment #43496033
If you want to keep in touch going forward, you're welcome to join our Discord or share a GitHub issue, we'll try to be quite responsive
-
comment
Comment #43496022
I'd say rules are quite similar to a README, just tailored to LLMs, which often benefit from slightly different information than a human would. One way to think about the differenc…
-
comment
Comment #43495952
This is a good callout, we'll definitely work to improve our messaging