Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sestinj

sestinj

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 11:04 PM UTC
HN karma
450
Public activity
108 items

About sestinj

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47054080

    Actually very similar, GitHub was also early in talking about Continuous AI. I think the biggest difference is that Continue is very focused on the use case of checks and gets a lo…

  2. comment
    Comment #47050944

    just saw the follow up questions: - we do! right now you can export some metrics as images, or share a link publicly to the broader dashboard. will be curious if others are interes…

  3. comment
    Comment #47050858

    I think this is a good summary! And the configurable part turns out to be the main bit One of the fundamental differences between checks and code review bots is that you trade brea…

  4. comment
    Comment #47050676

    That's us! I figure others will wonder the same, so we wrote about what exactly we're doing here: https://blog.continue.dev/from-extension-to-mission-control tl;dr - a _lot_ of peo…

  5. story
    Show HN: Continue – Source-controlled AI checks, enforceable in CI

    We now write most of our code with agents. For a while, PRs piled up, causing review fatigue, and we had this sinking feeling that standards were slipping. Consistency is tough at …

  6. job
  7. comment
    Comment #44438253

    Continue | ONSITE - San Francisco | Full-time | https://continue.dev Continue is building an open-source AI code assistant along with a hub of models, rules, and tools. Our VS Code…

  8. comment
    Comment #44162806

    Continue | ONSITE - San Francisco | Full-time | https://continue.dev Continue is building an open-source AI code assistant along with a hub of models, rules, and tools. Our VS Code…

  9. comment
    Comment #43506579

    If you're a user of .cursorrules or .windsurfrules, then there's a lot of great content at https://hub.continue.dev/explore/rules . They don't yet support assistant files directly …

  10. comment
    Comment #43501346

    We want Continue to always be free for individuals, and we layer on features for teams and enterprises to make money. There’s much more detail on our pricing page: https://hub.cont…

  11. comment
    Comment #43499253

    I'm sorry you ran into problems repeatedly, and couldn't agree more. As much as we've aimed to innovate on customization, it does not have to be an either/or. We recognized this, h…

  12. comment
    Comment #43499185

    Ooh +1 to both of these. We use shadcn as well :) and have been leveraging these docs: https://hub.continue.dev/vercel/shadcn-ui-docs , but there should totally be more in-depth ru…

  13. comment
    Comment #43499166

    It looks like people have created a few already: https://hub.continue.dev/search?q=flutter I think it would be great to have one on the front page as well if there's something you …

  14. comment
    Comment #43497671

    We didn't claim to be covered by AP, but I see what you mean: the previous text ("Learn more on TechCrunch and The Associated Press") wasn't clear enough. We've updated it to say “…

  15. comment
    Comment #43496819

    Totally, I actually think this would make for a really great custom assistant, probably even something we'd feature on the front page: https://hub.continue.dev/explore/assistants Y…

  16. comment
    Comment #43496810

    Rules are a subset of what we've allowed you to do on the Hub (and an important one). There are other building blocks, like models, MCP servers, docs, prompts, data, and more. We w…

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #43496789

    I hear this often (I had the same gut reaction before thinking below the surface) and will share why I think that our bet is perfectly aligned with the Bitter Lesson being true 1. …

  19. comment
    Comment #43496365

    Fix is released! Thanks for catching this so early Should now be able to remix PyTorch rules for example: https://hub.continue.dev/starter/pytorch-rules/remix

  20. comment
    Comment #43496334

    I wouldn't say that's free-loader behavior :) It's exactly what we want to make possible—if you have strong reason to use your own models (price, convenience, security, remaining l…

  21. comment
    Comment #43496298

    :D thank you!!

  22. comment
    Comment #43496292

    wow that was fast—some gems in there

  23. comment
    Comment #43496033

    If you want to keep in touch going forward, you're welcome to join our Discord or share a GitHub issue, we'll try to be quite responsive

  24. comment
    Comment #43496022

    I'd say rules are quite similar to a README, just tailored to LLMs, which often benefit from slightly different information than a human would. One way to think about the differenc…

  25. comment
    Comment #43495952

    This is a good callout, we'll definitely work to improve our messaging