Viewing profile — sergioj97

The op talks about what the "next step" will be. And as it hasn't already been, it's clearly speculation and in no way "stating what happens".

Well there are certainly many freedoms that we restrict or completely deny just because of the potential to misuse them (e.g. freedom to own a gun). I don't think this is the case …

Just wanted to note that while in your county the deaths from covid haven't exceeded (yet) 1% of infected, the article you link to states that in Italy, 8% of the infected have die…

I think some of those countries are usually referred to as Central America. From Wikipedia's article on Central America: "Central America consists of seven countries: Belize, Costa…

EU stands for European Union.

> I certainly don't agree with it but it makes a great conversation. Does it though? It seems like a fallacious comparation for reasons that other comments have already explained. …

If you read the tweets, you're in for a big surprise!

I personally found that the things the article's author argues that Zuckerberg doesn't understand are being acknowledged and discussed by Zuckerberg itself in the leaked comments.

> there's no way to "point fingers" and say "Look at what this company is doing!" What do you mean? The fact that different people may see different things in their feeds doesn't m…

Do you have citations for that? I'm interested and couldn't find convincing sources

I think right to be forgotten doesn't include public figures.

Seems like a rant to me. What exactly are you criticizing about the way Google decides which results to show first, in this particular case?

I think he commented that only because the OP said "even if it may not be the behavior we expect from our elected leaders".

Having an intelligent strategy does not mean you are intelligent, specially in politics. Probably none of this was his idea, but some adviser's.

Selam G wrote that Stallman considered that Minsky's victim was actually willing. That's not "planting evidence" in a legal sense because sure, that's not evidence at all. Mainly b…

I don't understand how what you've answered changes the fact that Stallman openly implied with his opinion that absence of consent (rape) makes a sexual relation unethical and bad.…

> Do you realize how many people -- not just men -- in CS, physics, mathematics are autistic, especially in places like MIT? Do you have any citations for that (for the fact that t…

He stated that the absence of consent is what makes it harmful. He is against rape, independently of the victims age.

You didn't just give an example of a leader who doesn't challenge things. You literally stated that if a follower disagrees with the leader, then "by definition" he/she is not a go…

Reading your link, I don't find anything troubling. He says the term is too ambiguous and it makes it easy to (potentially maliciously) misrepresent someone's acts. If you find any…

Stallman isn't pro-paedophilia. He stated years ago that he didn't see enough evidence to believe sexual relations with children are harmful for them if they are consensual. That's…

Keeping things in perspective, do you really believe what is happening now isn't going to ruin Stallman's life?

At this point of the conversation, your rejectal to accept that "Paedophilia is sometimes not harmful to children" effectively means "Paedophilia isn't always wrong" or "Paedophili…

It would be technically correct if what he meant was that the problem would be solved in constant time. I bet it wasn't.

I think there are health and quality issues unrelated to taste.