Viewing profile — semiquaver
semiquaver
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 04, 2009, 4:22 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,496
- Public activity
- 1,114 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About semiquaver
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #49222395
Because people can tell the difference between AI art and human art. Not true for logic unless you are incompetent.
-
comment
Comment #49221558
Claude, write a punchy blog post that inappropriately manipulates the definition of “inference” to make intel feel less threatened.
-
comment
Comment #49221387
This would be a “work-for-hire,” thus not owned by the artist. As a matter of fact, the law does not even consider the artist to be the author of the work . So the point you though…
-
comment
Comment #49218694
Congrats on having the worst take in a thread full of them.
-
comment
Comment #49218679
I am trying really hard not to accuse you of not having read what you posted, because your conclusions are in strong tension with what it plainly says.
-
comment
Comment #49214972
This is a false narrative based on a (IMO often intentional) misunderstanding. It has by no means been established by any court that LLM-generated code is not copyrightable. Thaler…
-
comment
Comment #49186373
This seems like a reach. Guy had an outstanding warrant and they did not need any pretext to arrest him.
-
comment
Comment #49186085
Mine or yours?
-
comment
Comment #49180286
Of course. Did I suggest otherwise? I merely made a (to me) amusing observation about the modern, somewhat confusing nature of so-called “ownership.”
-
comment
Comment #49177081
Because it’s a matter of public record. Thousands of executed contracts between flock safety and its customers are public. Here’s one which makes clear that flock retains ownership…
-
comment
Comment #49176524
Your theory about the scope of this conspiracy intrigues me. Who is leading it and how did they loop in the UK AISI?
-
comment
Comment #49173754
> the reason I can promise you if the military disappeared tomorrow we would not suddenly obtain the things you say we lack.
-
comment
Comment #49173686
> Dallasites Is that seriously the demonym? Terrible. Try harder, Dallasites.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49172986
And you’d consider zitron a serious person?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49172846
> and stolen I’m sure flock’s agreement with the Winona Police Department makes clear that they are only purchasing a license to use these cameras, so in fact the department’s came…
-
comment
Comment #49172263
I don’t see how “This guy has no experience in the field he is actively commentating on. None of his predictions have come to pass.” is an ad hominem. The critiques are directly re…
-
comment
Comment #49172094
Has ed zitron ever accounted for the fact that his predictions literally never come true? In most jobs such a poor track record would be disqualifying.
-
comment
Comment #49171789
Protein bros? Why so angry? Do you think hypertrophy and strength are not correlated?
-
comment
Comment #49171772
Well, if they can assume you’re probably sedentary they’re probably right.
-
comment
Comment #49170596
Yeah, did anyone really think that language policing would fix the issue?
-
comment
Comment #49162524
> A problem repeatedly occurred on "https://200ms.thenodebook.com/#act-O-prologue” I find this usually is caused by being too clever with layouts.
-
comment
Comment #49149681
The cope is tangible. Article is drenched in flop sweat to a remarkable extent, even for Mr. Marcus. I cannot see the goal posts, they have been moved so much.