Viewing profile — semaphoreP
semaphoreP
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 21, 2014, 10:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 294
- Public activity
- 69 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About semaphoreP
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30093893
Probably pretty difficult to find too many compelling cases. The bands starlink transmits in are designated communication bands, so interference from other satellites is going to b…
-
comment
Comment #30093121
Astronomer here, we are thinking about doing interferometers in space[1,2], but it won't be a catch-all for everything. One reason is that the instrumentation is equally as importa…
-
comment
Comment #28873680
Note that in these images, the planets are unresolved. They are point sources. Point sources span multiple pixels due to the sampling theorem.
-
comment
Comment #28873671
And this is the program that will study this system: https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/program-informa...
-
comment
Comment #17560487
Ah my bad, I mean that in the visible, you can't reach the diffraction limit with AO like you can in the near infrared. Certainly impressive matching HST from the ground. I don't t…
-
comment
Comment #17558659
Adaptive optics is really only effective in the infrared. And really only in the near-infrared, as past 5 microns, we can't really see through the atmosphere. In the visible, groun…
-
comment
Comment #16499285
It's not the absolute value of the signal. What they're measuring the amount of water compared to hydrogen.
-
comment
Comment #16498403
It's hard to measure absolute water abundances (it requires a lot of assumptions and extrapolating). This is a relative comparison of atmospheric water. We don't have relative wate…
-
comment
Comment #16498393
It will be very tough with JWST. Many of the biosignatures are small features, and not so easily detected. There's only a handful of planets for which this might be close to possib…
-
comment
Comment #15485815
We've also been observing the universe using neutrinos (generated by the weak force). In fact, there have even been one neutrino event linked to a possible astrophysical source[1],…
-
comment
Comment #15485423
Quite possibly I think. This is both confirmation that neutron star mergers do indeed exist and create kilonova, and the first detection of an astronomical event with both gravitat…
-
comment
Comment #15485288
Not involved in this, I'm guessing this is how it goes: there are algorithms that automatically register the image that was just taken, diff it with a reference image of the sky fr…
-
comment
Comment #14982360
Actually this star is not in the Kepler Field, and it is also too bright for Kepler. Even most ground based telescopes looking for transits probably haven't bothered looking at it,…
-
comment
Comment #14982338
Measuring the star wobble (i.e. doppler shift) doesn't give inclinations.
-
comment
Comment #14981463
I guess you're right. I know there aren't any observed transits, but I also don't know what the current constraints from monitoring the star's brightness for transit is (the star i…
-
comment
Comment #14981059
This title is a bit imprecise. They detected four planets with lower bound on their masses to be down to 1.7 Earth masses. Because these planets don't transit, there are no direct …
- story
-
comment
Comment #14878561
I recall there were issues if you tried to modify those files in Windows. Maybe they've fixed that in recent updates, but my impression was that while I could see the files, I shou…
-
comment
Comment #14878529
It works great for me. Like others have mentioned, it's not an emulator, so I don't feel sandboxed using it. The main downside is one of the caveats they mention: "Linux files are …
-
comment
Comment #14833510
Yeah, I only use Venmo when I'm on the coasts. None of my friends in the Midwest have it, and maybe I'm just used to it, but it just felt inefficient to split the bill and wait for…
-
comment
Comment #14638239
Optical interferometers have resolved Betelgeuse down to 9 milliarcseconds (4 x 10^-8 radians), so this isn't even the highest resolution image yet of this star[1]. [1] http://blog…
-
comment
Comment #14638107
JWST, like ground-based telescopes now, will be able to separate the light from massive Jupiter-like exoplanets from the light of their host stars. But it won't be able to see thin…
-
comment
Comment #14638086
The colors are only there to represent brightness, so the white spot is a brighter patch on the star (brighter because it's hotter).
-
comment
Comment #13769421
Or you can think of it as precision in the number of significant digits for a number. Each floating point number can only store a certain amount of significant digits. The fraction…
-
comment
Comment #13708709
It will depend on the size of the telescope, but for all practical purposes, these planets are too close to their star to see directly. A starshade will be good for Earth-like plan…