Viewing profile — semajian
semajian
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 8:22 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 73
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About semajian
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39724106
I had the same issue with ingesting lots of csv files in a previous version (8.x), though it seemed to be hardware dependent; issue was only on windows not Ubuntu. I think setting …
-
comment
Comment #38125586
I think Wolfram came up with some new theory of everything based on hypergraphs a couple of years ago, not sure what the current status is though. I would be surprised if it ever b…
-
comment
Comment #37059070
A quick look at the plots make me think this paper is legit and lk-99 is not a superconductor. Nice plots covering down to low temperature, unlike the original lk-99 papers which a…
-
comment
Comment #37011438
Well, yes
-
comment
Comment #37011409
It's hard to imagine how this could be faked short of digital manipulation, and it seems implausible that it would be a known high TC superconductor because it would warm up too fa…
-
comment
Comment #36966382
Thanks for linking someone who knows what he's talking about, very painful to see these DFT papers overhyped as some kind of proof... It proves almost nothing
-
comment
Comment #36966312
It's basically an open secret, no one really believes DFT has much predictive power in strongly correlated systems (where relevant electrons cannot be treated as independent). It's…
-
comment
Comment #36952490
There are so many bad DFT papers out there because it's cheap to do DFT compared to growing and measuring samples carefully. DFT is notoriously unreliable as a predictive tool in s…
-
comment
Comment #36663979
A bit too wordy for me, I wish Landau was around to rewrite books like these, they'd be much shorter. Can we get a LLM to make it happen?
-
comment
Comment #21678226
The standard model is basically a description of the fundamental forces, and is usually talked about by particle physicists studying things like the Higgs, quarks, etc. In condense…
-
comment
Comment #21257229
Yes, well said.
-
comment
Comment #21255404
I've never come across a physicist who used the term "inertia" to refer to any of the common relativistic quantities.
-
comment
Comment #21255365
Mass is a Lorentz scalar and thus is invariant; the mass of relativistic particles does not increase as velocity increases. One can say the force necessary to keep a constant accel…
-
comment
Comment #19895489
I guess the most prominent counterexample is Germany, which has basically free tuition. They also have different kinds of high schools preparing people for universities or trades, …
-
comment
Comment #18606698
I've never seen a number that high in my field, maybe 500 or 600 for the big shots, and even that seems wildly unreasonable to me. Feynman had about 85 peer-reviewed papers over hi…