Viewing profile — segfaultbuserr
segfaultbuserr
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 2:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 12,957
- Public activity
- 2,185 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About segfaultbuserr
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45403115
TCP port knocking.
- story
-
comment
Comment #42646763
The brain truly is a system with terrible service availability. On average, after running for just 16 hours, it must be offlined for 8 hours to run maintenance tasks such as "scrub…
-
comment
Comment #42535591
Is a binary search involved in this "gambling system"?
- story
-
comment
Comment #42068837
+1. Gorden Bell said a new computer category would enter the market every decade [1]. PDP-8 and later the PDP-11 were the quintessential minicomputer category makers. They were bas…
-
comment
Comment #42037157
In 1987, doxxing yourself was the norm. ~80% of the Usenet messages from the 1980s (to early the 1990s) had names, institutions, office addresses, and phone numbers attached to the…
-
comment
Comment #41954669
Sorry, it was a typo. I meant 2/3 (including common cables and fiber optics), not 1/3.
-
comment
Comment #41954633
What an embarrassing typo! I was thinking of 0.66, and somehow I thought 0.66 = 1/3 (must've been distracted by the "2" in 1/2). I should've written 0.66 or 2/3.
-
comment
Comment #41933469
1/2 c in circuit boards (FR-4), 1/3 c in cables, two useful numbers to remember.
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #40662649
I remember reading a great answer [1] from Stack Exchange, that claims: > the 1873 treatise used a pre-Heavisde form of vector calculus cannnibalized from Hamilton's quaternions ..…
-
comment
Comment #40662479
> You read some Wikipedia pages and Feynman lectures of physics. I'm a physicist who has done well over a decade of research in magnetic materials. In the same way that a geodesist…
- story
-
comment
Comment #40653236
You said, > Ferromagnetism has nothing to do with currents This is why I said ferromagnetism is circulating current in the sense of "to a first approximation" and "heuristically". …
-
comment
Comment #40650496
Knowing superconductivity makes magnets less mysterious. Once you accept that physics absolutely allows the creation of a static magnetic field from a circulating current that flow…
- story
-
comment
Comment #40585553
> I must confess, when I tried to answer the question I got it wrong...! (I feel silly). In programming there are two difficult problems - naming things, cache invalidation, and of…
-
comment
Comment #40585071
> There’s also part of, good designs don’t depend on high precision components. I think TAoE emphasized that. If I call correctly, TAoE said engineering calculations should never k…
-
comment
Comment #40584776
Also, in page 452 [5], Heaviside wrote: div B = 0 Finally in page 475 [6]: div D = ρ So yes, essentially all 4 Maxwell's equations were here. [5] https://archive.org/details/electr…
-
comment
Comment #40581340
> Maxwell was also not really taking advantage of them much and always split them up into scalar and vector part. Did Maxwell actually use quaternions? If I recall correctly, at le…
-
comment
Comment #40579838
I tried the quadratic equation, which is infamous for its loss of precision in numerical computations. The best output was merely a rewrite of the original equation using FMA (I'm …
-
comment
Comment #40487195
> and the syntax isn't that great, nobody even knows they exist. Linux kernel maintainers certainly do - they even invented a non-standard extension of C99's VLA notation (their ow…