Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sebk

sebk

HN member
Joined
Sat, May 07, 2022, 9:47 PM UTC
HN karma
232
Public activity
77 items

About sebk

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45372577

    I agree with this. One way to keep changes small but still compose them into a coherent PR is to make each commit in the final PR independently meaningful, rather than what actuall…

  2. comment
    Comment #44237402

    Counter-anecdotally, I reported two WebAuthn issues to Apple in separate instances and both were immediately fixed in the next patch version of iOS/Mac OS. In both cases first line…

  3. comment
    Comment #39709748

    There's a standard for this using NFC and UWB, Digital Car Key; BMW has support for either 2.0 (NFC) or 3.0 (UWB) across their entire range. The Hyundai Motor Company group (Hyunda…

  4. comment
    Comment #39085523

    Professor Daniel Abadi makes a similar point in his paper [1], where he improves on CAP with PACELC -- if there is a partition (P) how does the system tradeoff between availability…

  5. comment
    Comment #37664067

    Have a look at https://mitxela.com/projects/shamirs_password_store for an explanation of a suitable algorithm for this use case.

  6. comment
    Comment #36786320

    Beazley's Concurrency From the Ground Up is one of my favorite tech talks ever: In about 45 minutes he builds an async framework using generators, while live coding in an emacs scr…

  7. comment
    Comment #36764475

    UWB is augmenting Bluetooth for car keys solving this exact issue; The Car Connectivity Consortium came up with the Digital Key 3.0 standard that's available today, as implemented …

  8. comment
    Comment #35866916

    I think we both have exhausted our arguments regarding attestation. I understand why you don't want attestation to exist, and I believe you understand why I think it needed to exis…

  9. comment
    Comment #35865940

    > but this is blocking authentication based on attributes of the device, correct? Not precisely. It's requesting capabilities that the Yubikey is not configured to deliver so the b…

  10. comment
    Comment #35865381

    let me restate, they're not "blocking the description of a Yubikey" either. You can register one, and in fact I just did to try it out. The Yubikey needs to be configured with a PI…

  11. comment
    Comment #35864726

    Attestation doesn't carry that information. Also consider that Apple zeroes out attestation for its devices and works just fine with Google as passkeys. What's happening here is th…

  12. comment
    Comment #35864038

    100k devices is the minimum. Also I already agreed that this is an expansion of information, were it to be requested in practice and the user chose to provide it. And I don't belie…

  13. comment
    Comment #35862887

    WebAuthn goes to great lengths to preserve user privacy, much more so than past alternatives, so I don't think there's a expansion of information, especially when the device is pro…

  14. comment
    Comment #35862284

    I don't think FIDO saying importing/exporting keys is important and them having to standardize it is the same thing. The first and most straightforward reason is that we have no st…

  15. comment
    Comment #35862097

    The entire sync fabric would become the authenticator. Apple and Google could (but don't currently) issue attestation that the passkey ecosystem you're using is theirs for multi-de…

  16. comment
    Comment #35856261

    Please read the comment again, because that wasn't the argument I was making. I'll restate in case I wasn't clear -- the fact that it's wrapped addresses the "just a file"; meaning…

  17. comment
    Comment #35855561

    It's surprisingly difficult to figure what what a passkey is, precisely. I think there's a bit of a terminology issue. FIDO marketing materials talk about passkeys in the same way …

  18. comment
    Comment #35855197

    Yeah don't get me wrong, I wasn't disagreeing. I think the lack of interoperability is a major risk to adoption, but I also understand why we don't have interoperability today and …

  19. comment
    Comment #35855057

    Passkeys are not quite passwords even if backed by software and stored in the same memory space as other applications running on the OS. They're still asymmetric, cryptographically…

  20. comment
    Comment #35854991

    WebAuthn lets RPs reason about the strength and capabilities of the authenticator at registration time. With a mechanism like a shared file format and standard ways of transferring…

  21. comment
    Comment #35810859

    Fortunately you can undo these steps for $BANK1 and use your TOTP authenticator of choice: https://github.com/dlenski/python-vipaccess e: I think you added a reference to this as I…

  22. comment
    Comment #35804985

    It's called hybrid transport, and the old name for it was caBLE. Yubico has a nice explainer here: https://developers.yubico.com/WebAuthn/Concepts/Hybrid_Flows... It's not fundamen…

  23. comment
    Comment #35804834

    For the client-side, the spec is comprehensive in allowing the authenticator to decide whether backups are allowed. In this case it's iOS not exposing that to you as a user. I get …

  24. comment
    Comment #35804639

    Sure but this currently means a virtual authenticator that puts unwrapped passkeys in the same memory as other applications, leaving only the OS and no other physical measures to p…

  25. comment
    Comment #35804413

    Talking about Apple here because it's what I'm more familiar with, and their security whitepapers are more widely available. The PIN and key derivation wraps the actual encryption …