Viewing profile — sebk
sebk
HN member- Joined
- Sat, May 07, 2022, 9:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 232
- Public activity
- 77 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sebk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45372577
I agree with this. One way to keep changes small but still compose them into a coherent PR is to make each commit in the final PR independently meaningful, rather than what actuall…
-
comment
Comment #44237402
Counter-anecdotally, I reported two WebAuthn issues to Apple in separate instances and both were immediately fixed in the next patch version of iOS/Mac OS. In both cases first line…
-
comment
Comment #39709748
There's a standard for this using NFC and UWB, Digital Car Key; BMW has support for either 2.0 (NFC) or 3.0 (UWB) across their entire range. The Hyundai Motor Company group (Hyunda…
-
comment
Comment #39085523
Professor Daniel Abadi makes a similar point in his paper [1], where he improves on CAP with PACELC -- if there is a partition (P) how does the system tradeoff between availability…
-
comment
Comment #37664067
Have a look at https://mitxela.com/projects/shamirs_password_store for an explanation of a suitable algorithm for this use case.
-
comment
Comment #36786320
Beazley's Concurrency From the Ground Up is one of my favorite tech talks ever: In about 45 minutes he builds an async framework using generators, while live coding in an emacs scr…
-
comment
Comment #36764475
UWB is augmenting Bluetooth for car keys solving this exact issue; The Car Connectivity Consortium came up with the Digital Key 3.0 standard that's available today, as implemented …
-
comment
Comment #35866916
I think we both have exhausted our arguments regarding attestation. I understand why you don't want attestation to exist, and I believe you understand why I think it needed to exis…
-
comment
Comment #35865940
> but this is blocking authentication based on attributes of the device, correct? Not precisely. It's requesting capabilities that the Yubikey is not configured to deliver so the b…
-
comment
Comment #35865381
let me restate, they're not "blocking the description of a Yubikey" either. You can register one, and in fact I just did to try it out. The Yubikey needs to be configured with a PI…
-
comment
Comment #35864726
Attestation doesn't carry that information. Also consider that Apple zeroes out attestation for its devices and works just fine with Google as passkeys. What's happening here is th…
-
comment
Comment #35864038
100k devices is the minimum. Also I already agreed that this is an expansion of information, were it to be requested in practice and the user chose to provide it. And I don't belie…
-
comment
Comment #35862887
WebAuthn goes to great lengths to preserve user privacy, much more so than past alternatives, so I don't think there's a expansion of information, especially when the device is pro…
-
comment
Comment #35862284
I don't think FIDO saying importing/exporting keys is important and them having to standardize it is the same thing. The first and most straightforward reason is that we have no st…
-
comment
Comment #35862097
The entire sync fabric would become the authenticator. Apple and Google could (but don't currently) issue attestation that the passkey ecosystem you're using is theirs for multi-de…
-
comment
Comment #35856261
Please read the comment again, because that wasn't the argument I was making. I'll restate in case I wasn't clear -- the fact that it's wrapped addresses the "just a file"; meaning…
-
comment
Comment #35855561
It's surprisingly difficult to figure what what a passkey is, precisely. I think there's a bit of a terminology issue. FIDO marketing materials talk about passkeys in the same way …
-
comment
Comment #35855197
Yeah don't get me wrong, I wasn't disagreeing. I think the lack of interoperability is a major risk to adoption, but I also understand why we don't have interoperability today and …
-
comment
Comment #35855057
Passkeys are not quite passwords even if backed by software and stored in the same memory space as other applications running on the OS. They're still asymmetric, cryptographically…
-
comment
Comment #35854991
WebAuthn lets RPs reason about the strength and capabilities of the authenticator at registration time. With a mechanism like a shared file format and standard ways of transferring…
-
comment
Comment #35810859
Fortunately you can undo these steps for $BANK1 and use your TOTP authenticator of choice: https://github.com/dlenski/python-vipaccess e: I think you added a reference to this as I…
-
comment
Comment #35804985
It's called hybrid transport, and the old name for it was caBLE. Yubico has a nice explainer here: https://developers.yubico.com/WebAuthn/Concepts/Hybrid_Flows... It's not fundamen…
-
comment
Comment #35804834
For the client-side, the spec is comprehensive in allowing the authenticator to decide whether backups are allowed. In this case it's iOS not exposing that to you as a user. I get …
-
comment
Comment #35804639
Sure but this currently means a virtual authenticator that puts unwrapped passkeys in the same memory as other applications, leaving only the OS and no other physical measures to p…
-
comment
Comment #35804413
Talking about Apple here because it's what I'm more familiar with, and their security whitepapers are more widely available. The PIN and key derivation wraps the actual encryption …