Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — seangrant

seangrant

HN member
Joined
Fri, Sep 25, 2015, 11:54 PM UTC
HN karma
215
Public activity
77 items

About seangrant

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #20127812

    This is something I've wondered... Do all Facebook/Google employees drink the Kool aid? Are there no privacy proponents?

  2. comment
    Comment #20047695

    Rule-based ad blocking limited to 30k, as stated in the article. That's why people are upset.

  3. comment
    Comment #19985843

    Extreme moderation that makes conversation as boring as possible. That's how subreddits like /r/science stay sane.

  4. comment
    Comment #18798310

    Because cost is prohibitive.

  5. comment
    Comment #18567653

    How would it look if someone else got the patent and completely blocked Google? It's not even a question for large companies. The issue is this archaic patent and copyright system …

  6. comment
    Comment #18531584

    Never underestimate the power of fake internet points.

  7. comment
    Comment #18448282

    Not in America

  8. comment
    Comment #17941527

    It upsets me a lot how these financial institutions have complete power over us. God forbid a bank writes a loan to a scammer in your name, cause to them it's your fault. Absurd!

  9. comment
    Comment #17242852

    A consenting adult pays another consenting adult with more experience to do a life threatening task together. One dies. How is this not okay? What are you expecting? For people to …

  10. comment
    Comment #17157250

    The point of the crystal clear rules is to reduce how much the human operator needs to think about what they're doing. Should you teach your workers every legal nuance they need to…

  11. comment
    Comment #17104104

    Snapchat is not a "dick pic network" and if you've read the article maybe you could understand how someone can have a personal connection to a website, it's users, and the culture …

  12. comment
    Comment #16863813

    Why would they shut down all their locations at once, losing hundreds of thousands in income, if not for the media and social attention it would receive? Simply put, why close busi…

  13. comment
    Comment #16863139

    The fact that they're doing it all on one day at the same time implies it's mostly about the PR

  14. comment
    Comment #16781794

    Sounds like your life has been gracious to give you many different experiences. I think the distaste is mostly from people who've worked their lives in an office job. Yeah it's cak…

  15. comment
    Comment #16540489

    The fear comes from exactly that. People aren't worried about targeted advertising. People are worried that swathes of their data isn't "theirs" anymore and can suddenly be used ma…

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #16242972

    Wait, what?? I can inject my own Javascript into Google ads? How is this done?

  18. comment
    Comment #16199873

    Seattle area here. All my life I remember waiting in lines 10-20 minutes if you go to a store on a busy day (fri/sat/sun). It's just simple math sometimes where there's so many peo…

  19. comment
    Comment #16191619

    Costs $1 when the same can be accomplished with a native web app. Seems like a quick cash grab rather than "art" or anything.

  20. comment
    Comment #16121816

    if you have an extra raspberry pi laying around you can install an ad blocker for your entire network with pi-hole.

  21. comment
    Comment #16121458

    I'm an Instagram user that genuinely enjoys clicking on a lot of ads - to buy dumb cheap stuff. Pins, clothing, general apparel gets sent to me and it's exceedingly obvious when th…

  22. comment
    Comment #16121288

    As soon as those computers are cheaper than human labor, of course it makes sense. I wonder what our idea of low skilled jobs will be in the coming future.

  23. comment
    Comment #15659672

    You think they're not working on this kind of stuff already? How many of us have an ez-pass on our car?

  24. comment
    Comment #15554204

    Sending a tweet with intent to physically hurt someone, yes. Shouldn't it be?

  25. comment
    Comment #15179031

    Not really disingenuous when the point was he was looking at his "watch" and then calling plays. Looking at your phone every time would be an obvious tell.