Viewing profile — sds2
sds2
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 05, 2017, 5:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -15
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sds2
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15073317
> Difficult when the definitive compsci course, Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs starts, and ends, with Lisp. Poor choice. > Several decades of computer science di…
-
comment
Comment #15060485
> So first you say Lisp is useless in compsci because of the existence of "rust, c and idris", and now its pointless to use it because of ML? Idris and Rust are ML descendants and …
-
comment
Comment #15059385
You can do that more efficiently with any ML language. > There's a reason GCC's internals often look like Lisp. Dude, that notation is not original to lisp...
-
comment
Comment #15059381
Your sentences are the same : "it's so powerful" - it's ridiculous that there are ppl who call themselves programmers and still like js.
-
comment
Comment #15058426
No I don't have any experience in its memory management and I don't need it.
-
comment
Comment #15058304
> Javascript IS a powerful language with features that were not in other mainstream language for decades and some still don't have: first class functions, dynamic typing, lambda fu…
-
comment
Comment #15058292
> But if you are "computer SCIENCE"-school and you targeting variety of fundamental cocepts of field I say that lisp is quite essential. I'm sure you've nothing to do with compsci …
-
comment
Comment #15058285
Don't like my negative experience with lisp? I could guess it from your username.
-
comment
Comment #15057880
> JavaScript has also successfully escaped perception of "a language for brains". Research background is actually harmful for a modern programming language. Those who consider java…
-
comment
Comment #15057849
No, it shouldn't be. Lisp is not practical(try to prove it otherwise, there's no evidence) and it's only a thing now because some ppl likes its esoteric syntax. It's way too overhy…
-
comment
Comment #15012949
Yeah, nix doesn't feel right on debian because it can't manage services and doesn't use the "standard" packaging idioms. Is there someone else with a different experience or a work…
-
comment
Comment #15005089
You're using linux from 1999 and you've problems like this: "I spent two weeks trying to make my ctrl/capslock swap stick and not reset every time the computer slept/resumed."? It'…
-
comment
Comment #15005080
> Because I spent 4 hours today trying to figure out how to prevent something from starting on boot Learn systemd then? Or use the "Startup" app? > I spent two weeks trying to make…
-
comment
Comment #15005037
> Lisp under SBCL is as fast as Java under the latest Oracle JVM and for numeric computation is sometimes as fast as Fortran. Back it up. > I routinely read third-party Lisp librar…
-
comment
Comment #15005032
> The performance claim doesn't really matter in a world where we use languages like Python, Ruby, PHP and Javascript for major applications. Yes, it does. And those languages are …
-
comment
Comment #15002646
> I shouldn't have to go to terminal to edit a conf file to make audio or video work. I never needed to. > It does not work out of the box. It does. > You must know how to use term…
-
comment
Comment #15002639
> Linux is a great server OS but a really terrible choice on the desktop. Why?
-
comment
Comment #14997976
> It's unfortunate that ML and Lisp didn't gain greater traction but that's likely due to Unix. Lisp and ML are competing by nature(MLs are famous from their typesystems) and their…
-
comment
Comment #14971614
Where is the proof on vscode being "fast"? And compared to what? I can only talk about my and some of my friends' personal experience but it won't praise vscode's performance. It's…
-
comment
Comment #14971566
They changed their strategy?
-
comment
Comment #14963155
> Atom's defenders always bring up that it was made with electron as the reason for it's slowness.Then, VSCode came along and invalidated that. How so?
-
comment
Comment #14940416
> Having a single static type system that captures all differences across all versions of all browsers is not realistic. Why? Standards and abstractions are useful. > But even if i…
-
comment
Comment #14940386
Both Objective-C and Java are statically and strongly typed. What you're thinking about is probably a runtime-reflection mechanism. The JVM, java's host is capable of supporting dy…
-
comment
Comment #14937017
> Requiring explicit type declarations is usually unnecessary and always a nuisance. Except at function declarations and similar - they help to make the code more readable. It's no…