Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sdruskat

sdruskat

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 11:55 AM UTC
HN karma
42
Public activity
23 items

About sdruskat

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #28261264

    The agenda release and docs update came a few days later, yes. I think it might have been in the Gem already, albeit experimentally.

  2. comment
    Comment #28257062

    This is because CFF is mainly built to support the software citation principles [1], where it is argued (rightly so, if you ask me) that software is important enough to be cited in…

  3. comment
    Comment #28257041

    The guarantee is that you have citation information for a specific research output type: software (or dataset, as defined), and that it is the output you have found the CFF file wi…

  4. comment
    Comment #28257020

    @software is simply an alias for the fallback @misc, i.e., semantics are lost, no fields like different URLs for different software media (code, build artifacts, etc.), no software…

  5. comment
    Comment #28255817

    Not for providing citation metadata for software, where BibTeX misses important fields.

  6. comment
    Comment #28255505

    This is indeed something that needs to be solved. I think the current path in the schol comms community leans towards having contributors (with different roles) as well as authors.…

  7. comment
    Comment #28255453

    This is something that you can do by providing a `preferred-citation` in a CITATION.cff file. This will be rendered on GitHub as the thing to cite. See the schema guide section abo…

  8. comment
    Comment #28255444

    We're trying to bring CFF to other platforms as well, so everything just becomes stickier ;). E.g. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/337368 .

  9. comment
    Comment #28255433

    I guess the answer is semantics: who will guarantee (e.g. to downstream services) a CITATION.bib file will contain the metadata for the software in the repo? CFF is single-purpose …

  10. comment
    Comment #28255421

    Hi, and thanks for supporting CFF through the Zotero connector (for GitHub repos) now :). FYI, we're in the process of improving the website atm, including a Rationale section, etc…

  11. comment
    Comment #28255391

    Now including GitHub, that gives you BibTeX generated from CFF files :).

  12. comment
    Comment #28255386

    Hi, co-lead of the CFF project here. One advantage I see is semantics, and that it's single-purpose. Downstream clients (archives, indexers, GitHub citation feature, etc.) know exa…

  13. comment
    Comment #17353175

    Clutch predicted this in 2004: "Everybody move to Canada, smoke lots of pot, everybody move to Canada right now!" (Clutch, "The Mob Goes Wild", Blast Tyrant. DRT: 2004) https://you…

  14. comment
    Comment #17301146

    I've confronted my PhD supervisor (Professor of Library and Information Science) with this statement once, and she almost went berserk. Her take is that free text search is approac…

  15. comment
    Comment #16978935

    Software Heritage is doing great things, and will be central to current efforts in research software sustainability, software citation, and most of all reproducible research!

  16. comment
    Comment #16974717

    - Burnistoun (sample here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAz_UvnUeuU , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnistoun ): I have regularly thrown laughing fits over this. - Hardy Bucks …

  17. comment
    Comment #16124716

    Aims to be, yes. Early stages still, but it's well-supported by a number of institutions, funders, governments even.

  18. comment
    Comment #16124656

    Aaaand it's back.

  19. comment
    Comment #16124629

    It exist! Not a whitepaper, but at least a Medium article: https://medium.com/@alexberegszaszi/mango-git-completely-dec... . Ethereum + IPFS/Swarm as backend for Git. Source code i…

  20. comment
    Comment #16124448

    If all goes belly up there is always Software Heritage ( https://www.softwareheritage.org/ ).

  21. comment
    Comment #16124435

    Has been done now. https://status.github.com/messages .

  22. comment
    Comment #15904102

    Great concept promising potentially more in-depth experiences than the cpomtetition. I think that the single point of failure of the site would be failure to build a large enough c…

  23. story