Viewing profile — sdfsfsf3kjdf

Sure, it's definitely something worth taking into consideration, I just wouldn't value it too highly and in many cases I think there are much better indicators of ability.

> I imagine the developer pool is much smaller but the candidates are higher quality People always say this about their favorite niche language and it always feels a little too sel…

> but the longer your repl session is open and the more you change and compile, the more likely you are going to end up with a mixed state in memory that does not reflect how your …

Extremely shallow criticism based off of little more than personal anecdotes.

In Rust you can solve this via derive or a macro. Typescript's conditional types and the associated utility types are a nice solution to this problem as well. You can do a ton with…

How exactly are you going to implement a type safe option type without generics? You either have to use interface{}, which is obviously not type safe, or write/generate an option t…

> Is that not what generics would fix? No. That would be fixed by having something akin to typeclasses, traits or interfaces. Elm's List, Maybe and Array are all defined using a ge…

> Well, I just come from a Elm gig and I must say I was not too bothered with the lack of generics there. Elm has generics.