Viewing profile — sdadams
sdadams
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 14, 2022, 10:52 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sdadams
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #32471356
No error correcting codes currently. Just checksums and redundant copies. Currently the supported checksum algorithms are crc32, md5, and sha1.
-
comment
Comment #32462894
There is a FUSE implementation of ZFS for Linux but it is still in development. Porting it at this stage could be tricky.
-
comment
Comment #32462837
Thanks! I'll try to remember this for any future blog entries.
-
comment
Comment #32462478
The OpenBSD FUSE implementation is in base so it should already be well audited. I don't plan to add "concatenation" as you have described, however this can, in theory, be approxim…
-
comment
Comment #32462257
Porting ZFS to OpenBSD has been attempted before. See this blog post from 2013: https://flak.tedunangst.com/post/ZFS-on-OpenBSD
-
comment
Comment #32459464
The muxfs source code is a lot smaller than that of ZFS so if security is a concern to you then you might find muxfs easier to audit than ZFS. It also compiles quickly so could be …
-
comment
Comment #32459388
In another project of mine I considered using extended attributes to tag files into categories. With extended attributes not being universally supported and easily overlooked the c…
-
comment
Comment #32458381
OpenBSD removed support for extended attributes.
-
comment
Comment #32458339
OpenBSD's FUSE does not implement multithreading.
-
comment
Comment #32458328
(1) I believe that stable inode numbers are possible with FUSE but they must be implemented by the FUSE driver. Mirroring over a network is not the intended use case. The mirrors e…
-
comment
Comment #32458259
Author here. A big thank you to you all for your interest in muxfs! I will try to answer all of your questions as best I can.