Viewing profile — scromar
scromar
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 07, 2011, 2:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 90
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About scromar
Email me at scott at my domain.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8222498
This is true.
-
comment
Comment #7885270
Just conjecture here, but my guess is that "Tesla will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology" means that Tesla is going to req…
-
comment
Comment #7642647
I see general concept and specific implementation as being on a spectrum. If an invention is sufficiently novel/nonobvious, I believe the inventor is entitled to a patent on the ge…
-
comment
Comment #7640907
I posted a similar comment in the author's post, but I figure I'll post it here too in case anyone finds it useful. ---- I sympathize with the author's belief that many software pa…
-
comment
Comment #5544039
Even if the inventor refuses to sign the declaration, if they have an obligation to assign and are truly an inventor, their name will appear on the face of the patent. There are pr…
-
comment
Comment #5544015
That's one of the issues though. Which patents are the "truly new" ones and which are the "trivial ones"? It seems like many software patents seem obvious in hindsight, a few years…
-
comment
Comment #5543979
That's not the right approach, because usually an employee has an obligation to assign the invention to their employer. Frequently it's not really up to the inventor whether or not…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #5483277
Also, a lot of times it is difficult to avoid hindsight bias. It may arguably seem obvious now, in 2013, but it is hard to say what would have been obvious in 2004. Nonobviousness …
-
comment
Comment #5407375
No, just all the elements of any one of the claims.
-
comment
Comment #5213559
This is probably true, but remember that the single inventor has the option of publishing the invention rather than filing a patent application. The publication will then become pr…
-
comment
Comment #5213463
This may have been true many years ago, but today the term of a patent in the US is (with some exceptions) 20 years from filing. (See, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s27…
-
comment
Comment #5055261
Thanks for the feedback. I recognize that for many (all?) startups, legal issues are some of the last things that they want to have to deal with. We would make an effort to keep th…
-
comment
Comment #5055241
Thanks for the feedback! Those are great ideas. And you're right, I should have noted in the OP that the focus would be on U.S. law. However, patent law and patent issues frequentl…
-
story
Ask HN: Any interest in a free course on patents and IP for startups?
The HN community seems to be anti-patent (especially software patents) in general, however knowledge is power. Would you be interested in a free course on patents (and intellectual…
-
comment
Comment #4724281
Additional fee shifting information from a recent federal circuit ruling here: http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2012/10/should-we-move-towar...
-
comment
Comment #4444020
I don't think this is true in general. Most patents I have read have had very detailed descriptions of the invention. In fact, it is to the patentee's benefit to be as detailed as …
-
comment
Comment #4043987
1. You are right, but there are both potential copyright and potential trademark infringement claims in this suit. 2. The right of publicity is recognized in many states, and may b…
-
comment
Comment #4014090
My wife has had two-factor authentication for at least a year, she only accesses gmail from her iPod touch and the browser on her laptop, and she had this happen to her about a mon…
-
comment
Comment #3928268
The x200s does not have the keyboard in question, it has the classic thinkpad keyboard. The new keyboard is seen on some new lenovo models, most notably the thinkpad edge series.
-
comment
Comment #3879203
I was ready to pay, and then it asked me to put my credit card information into a non-secure page. Looking at the page source, it looks like they use Stripe for payments. Will the …
-
comment
Comment #3857892
You are right. The fourth paragraph does give some teeth to the agreement. However, the broad language of the second paragraph still gives the assignee a lot of wiggle room to argu…
-
comment
Comment #3857794
Edit: Now I think I was wrong in this reply. I did not realize that paragraph 4 of the agreement gives the inventor the right to license the patent to another party to enforce the …
-
comment
Comment #3857757
Edit: I was wrong here, see the reply below. No, the inventors don't have the right to license the patents to whomever is being sued. The twitter agreement gives all rights in the …
-
comment
Comment #3853115
Clarification to my reply above: I meant to say "opening statements", and "closing arguments", not the other way around. This is what they are are actually called, I'm not sure why…