Viewing profile — scottbot
scottbot
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 09, 2013, 5:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 90
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About scottbot
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18925903
To your first point, look to the other comments, which clarify this beyond what I was aware of. To your second point, yes you are correct; I didn't feel like getting into that was …
-
comment
Comment #18924165
If you do go on, I'll happily link to it in the article. There's no way I could have done everything, but I could have done a better job nodding to what's missing.
-
comment
Comment #18923343
I'm an academic historian, you're lucky this wasn't book-length.
-
comment
Comment #18923171
That's fascinating. I'm the author of the piece, and the material trick and its ramifications is new to me, thank you! This entire subject is not my area of expertise - I'm an hist…
-
comment
Comment #18923123
Hey, not the OP but the original author here! I was wondering why my server was going crazy; should've known it was HN. If you have issues, the page is already scraped into the Int…
-
comment
Comment #10570584
Carnegie Mellon Univ | Pittsburgh | Full time | Onsite Hiring a "digital humanities developer" to support humanities & social science research. Research background is a plus, and w…
-
comment
Comment #9260859
If you define science as anything that's falsifiable, then of course anything that isn't, isn't science. And hey, free sciencecountry, that's your prerogative. That said, the philo…
-
comment
Comment #9255870
Pron, as a historian who has come up with quantitative models and resisted the urge to call them predictive, yes, I think that sort of restraint is within humanit(y|ie)'s capable g…
-
comment
Comment #9255802
This ain't actually how science works, it's just an idealized account. Special relativity wasn't technically falsifiable compared to its competing theory by Lorentz, because both p…
-
comment
Comment #9254537
This is true, but not entirely relevant. Life-based complex systems often share a propensity for punctuated stability specifically due to their own nature, because of the same circ…
-
comment
Comment #5682348
My stance is much softer than that, but I should have made it clearer, because similar arguments are often made in anti-frequentist rants. I think that there is an appropriate plac…
-
comment
Comment #5681587
I agree, lying is bad regardless! My post isn't anti p-values, it's anti poorly-understood-or-performed-statistics. NHST just happens to be the subject of choice, because it's part…