Viewing profile — scofalik
scofalik
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 06, 2017, 8:38 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 35
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About scofalik
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47411829
I read both parts. Well written, I agree with a lot of stuff. I am long-time CKEditor dev, I was responsible for implementing real-time collaboration in the editor and the OT imple…
-
comment
Comment #20181574
> Operational Transformation (OT) is one of those algorithms, which have been evolving over time, as versions of it have been proven incorrect. Source or explanation required. Also…
-
comment
Comment #19856883
> OT is very simple to implement, but needs a server (...) Well, OT in general does not need the server but server-less implementations are more complex (more transforming function…
-
comment
Comment #19850953
What do you mean by "not fully collaborative"? Both presented solutions seems like quite collaborative.
-
comment
Comment #19848707
BTW. there's also a more fresh paper from the same authors: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.01302 I don't know how much they differ, though.
-
comment
Comment #19848600
We frequently joke in our company that we'd love to write a thesis on OT and get a better academical grade ;).
-
comment
Comment #19848554
> (...) if two keys depend on each other, and one user sets one key, and the other user sets another key, and the document is now invalid, you'd need the engine to be able to recon…
-
comment
Comment #19848502
So, what is your conclusion after reading it?
-
comment
Comment #19848477
Author of the linked blog post here. The example cases for additional types / custom implementation are in this section: https://ckeditor.com/blog/Lessons-learned-from-creating-a-r…
-
comment
Comment #19848439
I don't like "merge" word because it implies how the problem is solved. "Synchronise" would be better, as there is no merging, actually. We use Operational Transformation, so all t…
-
comment
Comment #19848178
> One way to solve this is to fallback to differential sync when syncing huge offline edits This is another question -- does automatic syncing make sense for huge differences in us…
-
comment
Comment #19848109
I still need to read that one, though it looks interesting (yes, I only got through the introduction and summary :)). Let's keep in mind that the authors already wrote several pape…
-
comment
Comment #19848088
This is an interesting subject, to be honest. Of course, it depends on the collaborative editing solution. When it comes to OT -- if the implementation is correct, it doesn't reall…
-
comment
Comment #19309551
Congratulations on providing a serverless solution. How do you think CRDT would fare in a tree-structured data model? We went with OT and server architecture because it seemed more…
-
comment
Comment #18247162
Oh, don't get me started on modifications we needed to do to make undo look reasonable ... :) At first, we thought that undo is the same thing as collaboration but... nope. The cru…
-
comment
Comment #18233494
Graveyard is just another root, like the main one. So, the same way that all elements have the same position in the main root for all clients, elements in graveyard also have the s…
-
comment
Comment #18232802
As far as I remember shareJS was available when we started to work on tree-based OT. We researched it but it turned out to be too simple for what we wanted to achieve and there was…
-
comment
Comment #18232655
Hi! Certainly, there are different use cases and different expectations. What we call "offline collaboration" can be seen as a special case of the real-time collaboration. In "offl…
-
comment
Comment #18232475
Our first idea was to have four basic operations (insert, move, attribute, remove) and then have “deltas” (wrap delta, unwrap delta, merge delta, split delta) which were built usin…
-
comment
Comment #18232386
It truly is the most interesting subject I've been working on yet. The fascinating thing about it is that it isn't a "solved" issue with one, correct solution, so you can feel like…
-
comment
Comment #18232341
Interesting question! Actually, at the moment we don’t :). We did some testing to see how big this issue is and it turned out that it's not dramatic. The main difficulty with grave…
-
comment
Comment #18232301
It seems that the link is fine. Scroll a little down and you can test the collaboration in Letters (built using CKE5) or with CKE5 document build (switch the tab).
-
comment
Comment #18232272
Using diffs was our very first approach. It was quite naive (not to say dumb) solution but we also came to a conclusion that it will be problematic for tree-structured data and the…
-
comment
Comment #18232194
Here's the link to the paper discussing tree-based CRDT: https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1784 . I personally find those papers very interesting!
-
comment
Comment #15506118
The idea behind storing and loading the data is, in short, this: HTML is the most popular format and it is the default when it comes to publishing web content. Most people want HTM…