Viewing profile — schwurb
schwurb
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 12, 2018, 9:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 148
- Public activity
- 107 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About schwurb
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34124168
That "Show your steps"-tipp is great, will try it out! Any other tipps for getting more correct (I know that LLMs are essentially autocomplete) output? Additionally: I wonder wheth…
-
comment
Comment #33805305
I find CT highly fascinating, worked through parts of 7 Sketches in Composability and have a functional programming background. I see the appeal, but I came to the conclusion that …
-
comment
Comment #33361958
Thank you! I knew about psychological safety, but the other points are new to me, will check them out.
-
story
Ask HN: Tipps for establishing feedback culture (task allocation and growth)
I work in a small startup and really like working there. However, we are lacking when it comes to feedback. Who gets to work on what is often not a team decision and there is no pr…
-
comment
Comment #31880130
Perfect timing! Last week I struggled to write documentation that would leave me satisfied - this framework explains why: I tried to write a reference, how-to and explanation at th…
-
comment
Comment #31653334
What you are describing is a Functor, one the two other important Haskell "design-patterns" (Functor - Applicative - Monad). "Mappable" is a good name insofar as it is more familia…
-
comment
Comment #31652430
I am gonna be heavily opinionated, take my words with a bit of salt ;) Here it goes: 1. One understood monads when one is able to write a monadic interface that behaves like any in…
-
comment
Comment #31652387
I offer a simple explanation elsewhere in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31652379
-
comment
Comment #31652379
For 99% of people, monads are best understood by a) using and writing many monadic interfaces and b) forgetting about the whole mathematical background. What a monad offers is: "1:…
-
comment
Comment #30505310
What you are doing is prototyping. Which is a good thing. However, writing stuff down is also another form of prototyping, which different tradeoffs. With coding, you are confined …
-
comment
Comment #30486355
> After reading one Python book you can write solid programs in Python. Okay, so our goal is to write a solid program. Let's see... > Not so in Haskell, you would need to understan…
-
comment
Comment #30479543
Adressing the whitespread conception "It is hard to programm in Haskell because it is pure": If you can write python, you can write Haskell. Don't believe me? 1. Write your program…
-
comment
Comment #30347932
Great article! Love the story approach.
-
comment
Comment #30209220
Can you exclude that this is a mental health issue? Something like ADHD, autism, sensory overstimulation might lower your productivity in subtle ways. This is also true for some ki…
-
comment
Comment #28582638
I came up with this trick (reviewing other PRs, after thinking how I would to it) to speed up learning technology at my working place where we don't have enough man power to do men…
-
comment
Comment #27948713
> I'm sure there's a lesson there somewhere. There sure is: Having one goal and being able to allocate all/most resources towards that goal. The problem is that this is not sustain…
-
comment
Comment #22404381
So does buying more lottery tickets. Surely, the odds at being lucky are better than in playing lottery. However, they are much less predictable than people assume. We tend to syst…
-
comment
Comment #21840657
Starcraft saved my A-levels, when I realized that school can be considered a game with points and stuff... Turns out that lecture participation had a great ROI! Now, if my future p…
-
comment
Comment #21766713
You could characterize Racket as THE lisp when it comes to well-behaved and well-researched metaprograming.
-
comment
Comment #21766594
> #define while if // saves cpu cycles lol, thanks for the laugh!
-
comment
Comment #21766535
I feel that the christian God fits this bill especially well, when you look at him a bit more abstractly: He is able to give purpose (does care and is something absolute rather tha…
-
comment
Comment #21758368
I concluded this early in my life, which makes me a minority amongst beliefers. I believe in God and that creatìon shows occasional traces of his genious, but I don't think they ar…
-
comment
Comment #21758253
If there was no foul play - good. Who cares about breaking a stupid record? That kid won't be able to break records all his life, so good on him dealing with a "failed" milestone n…
-
comment
Comment #21751415
Improvement treadmill can be seen as a subtle form of procrastination.
-
comment
Comment #21345119
No need to give up on your favorite text editor: Spacemacs offers all the amazing IDE capabilities (Vimscript is simply a bad language compared to elisp) while still being one of t…