Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — schismsubv

schismsubv

HN member
Joined
Sat, Apr 18, 2015, 1:02 PM UTC
HN karma
78
Public activity
38 items

About schismsubv

I am mostly a figment of my own imagination. Infosec and oddity.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14312245

    > it can be made much cheaper while keeping the good quality I'll spare you the anecdata, but the choice of bread and vegetables are specifically poor support structures on which t…

  2. comment
    Comment #12962353

    Try 20 years. I started the story back when book 5 came out and re-read (or skimmed) the series each time a book came out. I literally grew up alongside the characters (although bo…

  3. comment
    Comment #12449938

    Not English, but easy enough. - A sand ladder is a weight distribution mechanism that may be used to improve traction on loose materials. You can achieve the same effect by putting…

  4. comment
    Comment #11679744

    Consider it an anecdote, but my direct experience is exactly what you have heard. Consider that the ratio of administrators to classroom teachers is rarely lower than half the unio…

  5. comment
    Comment #11679497

    What's more, those teachers would actually often still do the job for those poverty wages in spite of the diminishing benefits for the love of their students and the job. I just wa…

  6. comment
    Comment #11625058

    Understood; I apologize to you and what audience there may have been at large for exceeding civil bounds.

  7. comment
    Comment #11613727

    At this point (indeed, long ago) your behavior has simply become illustrative of how to poorly carry out an argument, much less a constructive conversation. In an amusing irony, yo…

  8. comment
    Comment #11609696

    Do try to keep up. I said "When coming from the assumption that zero gun usage is acceptable (as you do)...", not that you espouse zero gun usage. Whether you've explicitly stated …

  9. comment
    Comment #11609345

    When coming from the assumption that zero gun usage is acceptable (as you do), the magnanimity of your offer must appear blinding. Imagine, gun users would not only be allowed to u…

  10. comment
    Comment #11606424

    I see. So beyond the noisome insistence that you understand the Constitution and US history better than all the Supreme Courts in history, you simply wanted some strawmen to knock …

  11. comment
    Comment #11605410

    Thanks, I take that to heart. I'm not certain what would alter public impression of guns and gun owners, but I'll attempt to think it out. I don't fit your stereotype of gun owners…

  12. comment
    Comment #11605351

    You're right, I'm a silly backwards hick from Lawrence that warrants only mockery and spite. That said, whatever you insist I'm not an absolutist. I don't think that all weapons-li…

  13. comment
    Comment #11605271

    No worries, I read it twice and realized it was an autocorrect mistake and what you'd intended. I recognize that you personally may not be calling for this, but in general individu…

  14. comment
    Comment #11605147

    I wish you'd be reasonable and discuss the matter rather than make sweeping, dismissive statements and veiled ad-hominem attacks. Consider me a poor, uneducated young soul and show…

  15. comment
    Comment #11605006

    You presume I must agree with your selective interpretation of historical writings as viewed by you through your own personal filter, because for you, your interpretation is the on…

  16. comment
    Comment #11604876

    Ostensibly because they're arguing about the weight and intent of the word, "designed". People saying guns are "designed to kill" are attempting to elicit an emotional response tha…

  17. comment
    Comment #11604566

    Knives, baseball bats, bows, darts, and even arguably dogs were all originally made primarily for causing harm. With the exception of dogs they're almost invariably manufactured to…

  18. comment
    Comment #11604232

    I think what most opposition to smart guns centers on is the assertion that the technology could "save thousands of lives". It would be great to see hard numbers of exactly how man…

  19. comment
    Comment #11604175

    Our answer is equally simple: some of what we have lost. We perceive it is you who has reinterpreted the Second Amendment. It appears you choose to categorically reject returns in …

  20. comment
    Comment #11604049

    Flare guns fall under the same air transport rules that full-blown firearms do. They must be transported in a case without ammunition that is locked and openable only by the owner.…

  21. comment
    Comment #11604042

    You seem to have missed the GP's point - go scan through the admittedly silly but illustrative cartoon linked. Gun rights have been repeatedly nibbled, sliced, and cut away over th…

  22. comment
    Comment #11603765

    If it's about politics, a lot of that extra stuff will be to make it non-bypassable. That said, just how many people are getting shot with their own gun as a component of overall f…

  23. comment
    Comment #11603508

    While I agree with (and just stopped writing a long response about) the unreliable and complex feature argument - consider adding the necessary components to a semiautomatic handgu…

  24. comment
    Comment #11603348

    Being trained in a device's use does not an expert on its design make.

  25. comment
    Comment #11488609

    I'm sorry I presented them as mutually exclusive, you're correct that they are not. The difference is that one is already illegal - stopped, as it were. I postulate that this law w…