Viewing profile — schismsubv
schismsubv
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Apr 18, 2015, 1:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 78
- Public activity
- 38 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About schismsubv
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14312245
> it can be made much cheaper while keeping the good quality I'll spare you the anecdata, but the choice of bread and vegetables are specifically poor support structures on which t…
-
comment
Comment #12962353
Try 20 years. I started the story back when book 5 came out and re-read (or skimmed) the series each time a book came out. I literally grew up alongside the characters (although bo…
-
comment
Comment #12449938
Not English, but easy enough. - A sand ladder is a weight distribution mechanism that may be used to improve traction on loose materials. You can achieve the same effect by putting…
-
comment
Comment #11679744
Consider it an anecdote, but my direct experience is exactly what you have heard. Consider that the ratio of administrators to classroom teachers is rarely lower than half the unio…
-
comment
Comment #11679497
What's more, those teachers would actually often still do the job for those poverty wages in spite of the diminishing benefits for the love of their students and the job. I just wa…
-
comment
Comment #11625058
Understood; I apologize to you and what audience there may have been at large for exceeding civil bounds.
-
comment
Comment #11613727
At this point (indeed, long ago) your behavior has simply become illustrative of how to poorly carry out an argument, much less a constructive conversation. In an amusing irony, yo…
-
comment
Comment #11609696
Do try to keep up. I said "When coming from the assumption that zero gun usage is acceptable (as you do)...", not that you espouse zero gun usage. Whether you've explicitly stated …
-
comment
Comment #11609345
When coming from the assumption that zero gun usage is acceptable (as you do), the magnanimity of your offer must appear blinding. Imagine, gun users would not only be allowed to u…
-
comment
Comment #11606424
I see. So beyond the noisome insistence that you understand the Constitution and US history better than all the Supreme Courts in history, you simply wanted some strawmen to knock …
-
comment
Comment #11605410
Thanks, I take that to heart. I'm not certain what would alter public impression of guns and gun owners, but I'll attempt to think it out. I don't fit your stereotype of gun owners…
-
comment
Comment #11605351
You're right, I'm a silly backwards hick from Lawrence that warrants only mockery and spite. That said, whatever you insist I'm not an absolutist. I don't think that all weapons-li…
-
comment
Comment #11605271
No worries, I read it twice and realized it was an autocorrect mistake and what you'd intended. I recognize that you personally may not be calling for this, but in general individu…
-
comment
Comment #11605147
I wish you'd be reasonable and discuss the matter rather than make sweeping, dismissive statements and veiled ad-hominem attacks. Consider me a poor, uneducated young soul and show…
-
comment
Comment #11605006
You presume I must agree with your selective interpretation of historical writings as viewed by you through your own personal filter, because for you, your interpretation is the on…
-
comment
Comment #11604876
Ostensibly because they're arguing about the weight and intent of the word, "designed". People saying guns are "designed to kill" are attempting to elicit an emotional response tha…
-
comment
Comment #11604566
Knives, baseball bats, bows, darts, and even arguably dogs were all originally made primarily for causing harm. With the exception of dogs they're almost invariably manufactured to…
-
comment
Comment #11604232
I think what most opposition to smart guns centers on is the assertion that the technology could "save thousands of lives". It would be great to see hard numbers of exactly how man…
-
comment
Comment #11604175
Our answer is equally simple: some of what we have lost. We perceive it is you who has reinterpreted the Second Amendment. It appears you choose to categorically reject returns in …
-
comment
Comment #11604049
Flare guns fall under the same air transport rules that full-blown firearms do. They must be transported in a case without ammunition that is locked and openable only by the owner.…
-
comment
Comment #11604042
You seem to have missed the GP's point - go scan through the admittedly silly but illustrative cartoon linked. Gun rights have been repeatedly nibbled, sliced, and cut away over th…
-
comment
Comment #11603765
If it's about politics, a lot of that extra stuff will be to make it non-bypassable. That said, just how many people are getting shot with their own gun as a component of overall f…
-
comment
Comment #11603508
While I agree with (and just stopped writing a long response about) the unreliable and complex feature argument - consider adding the necessary components to a semiautomatic handgu…
-
comment
Comment #11603348
Being trained in a device's use does not an expert on its design make.
-
comment
Comment #11488609
I'm sorry I presented them as mutually exclusive, you're correct that they are not. The difference is that one is already illegal - stopped, as it were. I postulate that this law w…