Viewing profile — sbszllr
sbszllr
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 07, 2018, 1:28 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 685
- Public activity
- 73 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sbszllr
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47807185
It's possible and even likely there's industrial espionage going on. But imo, you don't need that. I've worked in cutting edge industries, and even when you don't know what your co…
-
comment
Comment #47807003
It's interesting how OpenAI and Anthropic effectively mass dumped a bunch of similar features in the last two days. I wonder what other features they're cooking right now.
-
comment
Comment #47613507
Maybe it just shows my lack of tolerance for process/overhead. As a fellow rebase enjoyer, I will do it occasionally for smaller PRs but to me, it becomes unwieldy for large ones. …
-
comment
Comment #47613296
Let's forget that this post is an ad. I feel like there is a use for LLMs that could help us do stacked PRs better. Right now there are effectively three ways to do a PR: - a bunch…
-
comment
Comment #47234060
Daisy chaining finally supported.
-
comment
Comment #47111185
I was thinking a similar thing when reading the article. Often, the validity of the input depends on the interaction between some of them. Sure, we can follow the advice of creatin…
-
comment
Comment #47012783
> We already had that disaster where pop-ups fly out "do you want to accept those cookies". That is just a usability nightmare. People are forced into extensions, just to stop wast…
-
comment
Comment #46785615
The quality and usefulness of it aside, the primary question is: are they still collecting chats for training data? If so, it limits how comfortable, and sometimes even permitted, …
-
comment
Comment #46607484
I agree that is performant enough for many applications, I work in the field. But it isn't performant enough to run large scale LLM inference with reasonable latency. Especially no…
-
comment
Comment #46607257
Interestingly enough, it is possible to do private inference in theory, e.g. via oblivious inference protocols but prohibitively slow in practice. You can also throw a model into a…
-
comment
Comment #46553712
These are fair points but the weight of their impact is a misconception. Times and times again, lower capital and investment risk aversion are shown to be the limiting factors.
-
comment
Comment #46218792
There's a lot of truth and real pain points in the article but others miss the point entirely. Two things that stand out to me in particular: - C "standard" is quite flaky in pract…
-
comment
Comment #45892785
I've been camera scanning 4x5 and I'm happy with the results. Take two offset photos and stitch them in post. Mind you, I scan with pixel shift for higher res.
-
comment
Comment #45892481
As someone who has a mirrorless scanning setup for my film, and pondered getting a dedicated scanner... the price of this is quite steep given how inflexible of a tool it is. A sec…
-
comment
Comment #44550184
I don't know if it's still true in the recent versions of Scala (stopped caring in 2018) but it used to have implicit parameters designed specifically for passing context like this…
-
comment
Comment #44169296
Anecdata but I also had good experiences reaching out to MEPs, so not all is lost. At its core, the core issue seems to be the lack of accountability between the MEP, and people th…
-
comment
Comment #44168738
Usual reminder -- if you're an EU citizen, call up your representative.
-
comment
Comment #43737050
All can be true depending on the business/person: 1. My company cannot justify this cost at all. 2. My company can justify this cost but I don't find it useful. 3. My company can j…
-
comment
Comment #43736982
The issue with many of these tips is that they require you use to claude code (or codex cli, doesn't matter) to spend way more time in it, feed it more info, generate more outputs …
-
comment
Comment #43664412
Yup, I prefer Lightroom to Capture One, especially for film-related workflows. But I just can't go back to their predatory pricing practices, and the absolute malware of a programm…
-
comment
Comment #43600418
Source: I have a relationship with OpenSSF but not directly involved. I'm involved in a "competing" standard. As other commenters pointed out this is "just" a signature. However, i…
-
comment
Comment #43493049
Hmmm, there're no scientific work that really let's you do these things right now. And the repo doesn't cite any work, no associated paper.
-
comment
Comment #43310062
> In my view, the optimal scenarios for using LLM coding assistants are: > - Architectural discussions, effectively replacing traditional searches on Google. > - Clearly defined, s…
-
comment
Comment #43039349
I agree with your point that government overreach is more serious. Which is why I want to emphasize that various government police (like FBI) notoriously buy data that they would n…
-
comment
Comment #42865469
Might is irrelevant and doesn't prevent any abuse, nor does it foster innovative environment. Both the EU and the US, need to pick a side. Either they should make it illegal and es…