Viewing profile — sbpayne
sbpayne
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 24, 2015, 8:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 186
- Public activity
- 85 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sbpayne
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47678981
So many people complained about using GPT 5.4 in OpenClaw... But after some tuning, it actually works great?
- story
-
comment
Comment #47496701
Agreed! And I hope that we see the principles emerge in many other frameworks to make all our lives a little bit simpler
-
comment
Comment #47493255
the bitter lesson comes for us all, unfortunately!
-
comment
Comment #47493104
Thank you! Let me know if anything could be more clear, always something I can improve here I'm sure :)
-
comment
Comment #47493024
yeah the point I want to get across is less "you should use Dspy" and more "understand Dspy, so you are intentionally implementing the capabilities you need" Implementations are ge…
-
comment
Comment #47493001
You can see many people saying this in the comments :). I personally think this misses the core of what Dspy "is". Dspy encourages you to write your code in a way that better enabl…
-
comment
Comment #47492902
I think many people have the same experience! And that's the point I'm trying to make. There are patterns here that are worth adopting, whether or not you're using Dspy :)
-
comment
Comment #47492875
I think the reality is that prompt optimization is one of the only "legible benefits" (ie easy to understand why its valuable). But I think it misses the point of what Dspy "is". I…
-
comment
Comment #47492732
we have been using Agent Framework. I also have been eyeing LlmTornado. Personally, I find dotnet as a whole hard to implement the kind of abstractions I want to have to make it er…
-
comment
Comment #47492565
I think automatic optimization is valuable, but it's not what Dspy "is"; you can see this consistently through @lateinteraction's tweets. And hopefully it's clear enough from the p…
-
comment
Comment #47491666
The "whole product" idea here makes a lot of sense to me. I think this is often a big barrier to adoption for sure!
-
comment
Comment #47491616
yeah this is the main point I wanted to get across! I rarely recommend people to use Dspy; but I think Dspy is often so polarizing that people "throw out the baby with the bathwate…
-
comment
Comment #47491600
This is very true! I could have been more careful/precise in how I worded this. I was really trying to just get across that it's in a sense easier than some tasks that can be much …
-
comment
Comment #47491511
I think in some sense, this is the real thing everyone wants. Everything else is kind of an implementation detail! Would be really curious to see what you're building!
-
comment
Comment #47491491
Great feedback! I took for granted that people reading would be familiar with what Dspy is. I'll try to add this in tonight to introduce folks better. Thank you!
-
comment
Comment #47491479
To be clear: I don't know that I would recommend using it, exactly. I would just make sure you understand the lessons so you see how it best makes sense to apply to your project :)…
-
comment
Comment #47491428
I think the core challenge here is that being able to (in "development") quickly change the prompt or other parameters and re-run the system to see how it changes is really valuabl…
-
comment
Comment #47491405
This is definitely a mistake! What contact section are you referring to? The only references to contact I see in this post now are at the end where I linked to my X/LinkedIn profil…
-
comment
Comment #47491361
I have never heard of this! I took a quick look. I think I'm definitely not in the right audience for a tool like this, as I am more comfortable just writing code. But I think putt…
-
comment
Comment #47491231
I saw this some time ago! I personally have a distaste for external DSLs as I think it generally introduces complexity that I don't think is actually worthwhile, so I skipped over …
-
comment
Comment #47491218
Yeah, I find it hard to recommend Dspy. At the same time, I can't escape the observation that many companies are re-implementing a lot of parts of it. So I think it's important to …
-
comment
Comment #47491187
I personally haven't looked super closely at ADK. But I would love if someone more knowledgeable could do a sort of comparison. I imagine there are a lot of similar/shared ideas!
-
comment
Comment #47491151
I think this is an important point! I am actually a big fan of doing what works in the language(s) you're already using. For example: I don't use Dspy at work! And I'm working in a…
-
comment
Comment #47491102
I think all of these things are table-stakes; yet I see that they are implemented/supported poorly across many companies. All I'm saying is there are some patterns here that are im…