Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — saulpw

saulpw

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 06, 2021, 3:55 PM UTC
HN karma
3,561
Public activity
1,238 items

About saulpw

You can email me at hackernews@saul.pw.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49226102

    Friendster

  2. comment
    Comment #49223932

    I don't think that's true. Games are a product of their time and context; if Tetris didn't exist, do you think it would be a massively popular hit today? I can see it being an inte…

  3. comment
    Comment #49199659

    That's not suspicious, that's the load-bearing smoking gun.

  4. comment
    Comment #49199508

    Do you mean "punctuated equilibrium"?

  5. comment
    Comment #49190201

    "Too big to fail" should trigger anti-trust and be broken up.

  6. comment
    Comment #49174727

    > You're obliged to maximize their earnings. This is not true. Fiduciary responsibility does not mean "maximize earnings". This one fiction has done more damage in the name of unfe…

  7. comment
    Comment #49163059

    That's "this year" [the past 12 months].

  8. comment
    Comment #49159381

    That's what happens when you inject a lot of money into a sector/company, it attracts people who only want to maximize money. This is honestly what has ruined the tech sector over …

  9. comment
    Comment #49136211

    They fired Opus 5 as their assistant (in part for calling out a LinkedIn draft post as "engagement bait", which sounds like it might have been calling a spade a spade), and moved t…

  10. comment
    Comment #49128785

    I'm still using my Thinkpad from 2016.

  11. comment
    Comment #49117271

    Hey, cut us some slack, we were raised by Boomers.

  12. comment
    Comment #49072960

    Have you tried using this to actually edit anything? The local transcription is trash (slow, tons of repeated words, no speaker diarization, no option to upload a transcript or use…

  13. comment
    Comment #49072473

    He works at Tesla already.

  14. comment
    Comment #49071418

    I don't think they mean "monetarily". But once you have some reasonable parity you can implement your own features/workflow as you want them and not be reliant on Descript.

  15. comment
    Comment #49071375

    I hate Descript, not because of the cost but because of their dark patterns. (I learned recently that their CEO is the former CEO of Groupon, which explains a lot.) So I'd love som…

  16. comment
    Comment #49010762

    Your parents didn't have the legal authority to print money. It's almost like running a household is different from running a business, is different from running a nation.

  17. comment
    Comment #49009775

    I have been using vi/vim for 30 years and I had no idea about using ^K-M to insert an em-dash.

  18. comment
    Comment #49008900

    There are many reasons people might not read your documentation, and "it isn't good enough" is only one of them. To wit: - they don't know about it - they can't find it when they n…

  19. comment
    Comment #48972066

    Sorry it felt condescending. I'm sure you think it's obvious that you "did the work" because you know about scientific notation and understand the notation. I thought I had done it…

  20. comment
    Comment #48969767

    It feels like that at first glance because you haven't done the work to internalize the notation. This is like someone who uses Roman Numerals being introduced to decimal notation,…

  21. comment
    Comment #48966028

    (Author of Mag World here) I'm here to attest that it's worked for me! I see now that I had a fractured collections of number lines in my head (thousands, millionths, billions, and…

  22. comment
    Comment #48952953

    RC is a great community and I will be forever grateful to them for introducing me to several good friends that are still in my life 10 years later.

  23. comment
    Comment #48941719

    Sorry but this is one of those instances where you have to kill your darling. You can't sacrifice readability for textual content.

  24. comment
    Comment #48915445

    Okay, well said. Maybe we should try one year of each and then put it to a popular vote.

  25. comment
    Comment #48915214

    It takes more energy to liberate the oxygen than you could ever get from the fuel. You don't need oxygen atoms, you need the oxidant.