Viewing profile — sarciszewski
sarciszewski
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 2:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,268
- Public activity
- 1,771 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sarciszewski
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
-
story
Ask HN: How does your company handle application security?
How does your company ensure the code you produce (or consume) is secure? Do you have in-house security controls? Third-party penetration tests? Independent code audits? Bug bounty…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #11290510
(Switching back to my old account because rate limits.) I wouldn't ever use something like FizzBuzz to assess a candidate. It would be more of "here's a mostly finished sample appl…
-
comment
Comment #11290088
> All true but my observation is that the companies that put candidates through multi-day-out-of-town interview processes can afford to miss out on the candidates that can't do it.…
- story
-
comment
Comment #11166698
> RSA security depends mostly on how you build your private keys and ECC security depends on what parameters and what curve was chosen. No. RSA security depends on getting your par…
-
comment
Comment #11164063
I really appreciate the level-headed discussion in this thread so far, especially the comment I'm replying to. It's a stark contrast to the CFRG mailing list. (At least, so far, no…
-
comment
Comment #11159638
http://pastebin.com/AYW682BJ https://archive.is/exvT2
-
comment
Comment #11151528
Person: "I'm starving and barely able to get by working for Yelp in SF." Yelp: "You're fired." (Good luck paying rent without a job.) Yelp CEO: "The cost of living is too high here…
-
comment
Comment #11143520
How would transforming it before sending it over the wire help here?
-
comment
Comment #11143500
No, it's one-way cryptography, but it's not a form of encryption. https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/08/you-wouldnt-base64-a-pass...
-
comment
Comment #11137412
Cryptocat was not secure. No argument there! Decryptocat was the proof in the pudding. If a secure product could be as user-friendly as Cryptocat was while still being secure, then…
-
comment
Comment #11136632
See: "but the execution was flawed." > Security at the expense of usability comes at the expense of security. It got the usability part down, it just wasn't secure. And I wasn't cl…
-
comment
Comment #11135924
Cryptocat was a good concept (i.e. it was USABLE!), but the execution was flawed. It grew a lot of criticism and Nadim made mistakes in handling some of his critics, creating a sch…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #11133815
Warning: Autoplay video.
-
comment
Comment #11131773
"shoulder surf protection"?
-
comment
Comment #11130346
No, you're saying "which of this limited set of companies are you going to authenticate with" instead. If you don't want to be guilty of taking users' agency away from their own tr…
- story
-
comment
Comment #11127590
> I don't understand why they would trust over a dedicated authentication storage place but that's their choice. What if happens to be a security engineer, and happens to be Silk R…
- comment