Viewing profile — sarah180
sarah180
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 24, 2016, 9:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 473
- Public activity
- 136 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sarah180
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34060585
My 40s have been way better than my 20s or 30s. It's not even close. The best part of your life does not have to be behind you.
-
comment
Comment #30208519
Insiders are often very overexposed to a single company because it's their primary form of compensation. You can sell every share you have and still be overexposed due to unvested …
-
comment
Comment #28138746
There are good points here, but I think analogizing the situation into a class struggle within a society is both confusing and specious. Ethereum is not a civilization: it's a piec…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #27284264
I mean anybody can sue anybody for anything, but to win damages you'd have to prove that either Tesla intended to mess up his previous job or that they were negligent (based on a l…
-
comment
Comment #26995370
Unless you want to watch HBO Max, in which case you need a dongle….
-
comment
Comment #26725902
But it is optional. There's social pressure for all kinds of things, including getting married and having children. You have to figure out how to get food & shelter and follow loca…
-
comment
Comment #25155099
Not a flash in the pan after all!
-
comment
Comment #25151115
> I was intentionally gendering the term here. My goal was to have someone notice that I used Congresswoman in a negative context.
-
comment
Comment #25151101
Can we take this solved problem and replace it with a new one that has details we haven't figured out?
-
comment
Comment #25007229
On the third hand, you’re deliberately using sexist language to … secretly fight sexism? I think a continued evaluation is indeed in order.
-
comment
Comment #25000528
Is there a particular reason why it's women in Congress who make you skeptical? Is there some context I'm missing here?
-
comment
Comment #24945023
Google and Microsoft were not the first web spiders. A famous example, Yahoo!, didn't walk away from search and partner with Microsoft because of the difficulty of building an inde…
-
comment
Comment #24944366
Something to know about RWhiteGoose: https://imgur.com/a/X7qLRXa And his response: https://mobile.twitter.com/RWhiteGoose/status/10677075646897... How these are weighed against one…
-
comment
Comment #24943471
It's not entirely gone: https://www.lingscars.com/
-
comment
Comment #24918254
> How can you sum the numbers in a row without writing a line of code? Drag your mouse over the cells and press the sum button.
-
comment
Comment #24841448
Spidering and building an index is relatively easy. It's not the barrier to creating a search engine, and I don't think you'd find that Microsoft's index is materially smaller than…
-
comment
Comment #24841302
They're not private attorneys who have the US as their client. They work for an organization (DoJ) that has the US as its client. That organization can have whatever policies it wa…
-
comment
Comment #24779685
A better way to think about it is that grades and test scores are probably not enough if you want to get into an elite school. Universities want interesting people who will enrich …
-
comment
Comment #24776415
In 2015, the valuation of the company was $4 billion below the valuation of the Alibaba stock it held. A popular interpretation of this is that the main Yahoo! operations were cons…
-
comment
Comment #24776374
Yahoo! hasn't been a company for years. It's just part of Verizon's media group.
-
comment
Comment #24757794
"I don't trust either, but I'm confident my ISP would sell me out for 12¢ if given the chance."
-
comment
Comment #24666164
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story!
-
comment
Comment #24666156
This reminds me of something that happened at a company I worked at maybe ten years ago. An employee was fired for setting up a webcam that pointed at his 2FA key generator so he c…
-
comment
Comment #24663860
World of Warcraft came out in 2004. Coincidence?