Viewing profile — sanderjd
sanderjd
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 16, 2010, 12:01 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 17,130
- Public activity
- 7,259 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sanderjd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49248856
Yes, but it's good for everyone that the strategy of attempting to commoditize the cash cow of a competitor exists.
-
comment
Comment #49248805
What I think is that something the "exponential scaling to AGI" thesis pays too little attention to is resource constraints, and that this is the answer to your question. What will…
-
comment
Comment #49248741
I don't know about "unquestionably", but yes, I think this is a better path than the proprietary models.
-
comment
Comment #49088471
Yeah in our system, those kinds of governments happen when there is a split in Congress (one party has a majority in the House, the other in the Senate) and/or when Congress and th…
-
comment
Comment #49082420
Yes that's the "this" I was referring to. I guess a day later I don't really agree with my own comment that this would be "great", but it would be a silver lining of that happening…
-
comment
Comment #49078459
What was the quote? For what it's worth, I do really think that Amodei believes in and cares about safety. But that is not the same as believing that he is entirely altruistic or a…
-
comment
Comment #49078006
What I would say is that to me the "Democrats look weak" thing is pretty silly. By design, if one party holds the presidency and both houses of Congress at once, they get to enact …
-
comment
Comment #49077536
So, this might not be clear as an outsider to American politics, but to me this is not a "Republican vs. Democrat" thing. To me, it's about what kinds of Republicans and what kinds…
-
comment
Comment #49077440
Yeah I think this is right. The best setup is when a true belief aligns with a competitive moat. I definitely believe that (to his credit!) Amodei is a true believer in safety. But…
-
comment
Comment #49077166
Does this really seem exceedingly clever and hard to foresee to you? To me, it seems like a pretty standard regulatory capture strategy. This doesn't even mean that they're wrong a…
-
comment
Comment #49077055
This is not an argument that the Chinese system of government is better than the US system. Like I said, I'm more optimistic than a lot of people I know that the US will be able to…
-
comment
Comment #49076925
Yes, I've seen it! It's exciting, but I don't have enough information to say whether they are making "a real go of it". That is, it's unclear to me whether they have the tens to hu…
-
comment
Comment #49076909
Sure, I don't have an argument with this. But I'm unconvinced that "therefore all models must be proprietary" follows at all naturally from it.
-
comment
Comment #49076878
It would be awesome to have actual open source (and open weights) models! I hope someone will make a real go of this at some point.
-
comment
Comment #49076860
Actually this would be pretty great, because it would incentivize US labs to pursue the open weights strategy for the same reasons China is currently. I genuinely think that this i…
-
comment
Comment #49076818
The problem is that at the current moment with the current administration, it does not seem like we do "have laws and ways to fight against it". I'm more optimistic about the likel…
-
comment
Comment #49076787
Why has "open weights" become synonymous with "Chinese" in the first place? To me, that is the problem. I also prefer US models. But I want there to be competitive open weights mod…
-
comment
Comment #49076734
I mean... I'm not even extraordinarily cynical about this stuff, but to me this seems like a totally normal level of corporate gamesmanship? Companies look for and seek to maintain…
-
comment
Comment #49049733
Same as it ever was.
-
comment
Comment #49049712
I think #1 is quite a good thing, on net.
-
comment
Comment #49049699
Great framing.
-
comment
Comment #49049676
I do think the comment is right about understanding. I'm still feeling out what I think is the right level of understanding to invest in now. I think it is probably not the deep li…
-
comment
Comment #49021674
Yep, different strokes for different folks.
-
comment
Comment #49021204
I could be convinced of this narrative. Like, if someone writes a book about this, with good evidence of what caused this to happen, I might find that persuasive. But to me, what h…
-
comment
Comment #49015221
I dunno. To me, this seems like kind of a counterexample (pun intended?) to that thesis. Would a conversation with another AI have been as fruitful as this conversation with Tao? C…