Viewing profile — samwho
samwho
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jun 25, 2011, 2:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,458
- Public activity
- 327 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About samwho
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #48996447
You are extremely welcome.
-
comment
Comment #48995311
Sam Rose here. Thank you <3
-
comment
Comment #48745964
I gave my boss every opportunity to stop me.
-
comment
Comment #48745950
Single browser.
-
comment
Comment #48743143
I learned that etcd wasn’t required while making webernetes! I’d always thought it was, was cool to learn some clusters use other storage backends.
-
comment
Comment #48743135
Completely agree! Wasn’t trying to discourage, hope it doesn’t have that effect.
-
comment
Comment #48743121
Thank you! To address the earlier comment: I didn’t go down the “implement the OS-level stuff required to get k8s to compile to wasm” path due to bundle size, honestly and truly. M…
-
comment
Comment #48740795
I’d guess that about 90% of the webernetes code is ported directly from the Kubernetes codebase. In that sense it is a port of Kubernetes to the browser. But the CRI and CNI are fa…
-
comment
Comment #48740764
I’m 100% confident it would be possible to do a worker-per-pod runtime. If you’re serious about trying to make it then slide into my DMs, would love to talk about it. I also think …
-
comment
Comment #48740739
This is it. If you’re building something novel, and you want to rely on LLMs, you need to invest heavily in making tests. You don’t have the luxury of a reference implementation li…
-
comment
Comment #48740672
I have some potentially bad news for you: https://samwho.dev/load-balancing https://encore.dev/blog/queueing
-
comment
Comment #48740661
For some projects I think only reading the tests is probably fine. In this project I didn’t think it was enough purely because it’s a port of existing code, so there was a need to …
-
comment
Comment #48740640
Web workers were on my mind from the start but I never found myself needing them. They were always my ace-in-the-hole if this ended up being too CPU hungry on the main thread but i…
-
comment
Comment #48740618
Sadly Katacoda got paywalled (totally get why they did it, these things have costs). I think some other similar platforms disappeared because they ran out of people willing to fund…
-
comment
Comment #48158558
Looking really good! Great work.
-
comment
Comment #47522455
You’re welcome! Thanks so much for the kind words.
-
comment
Comment #47522311
Thank you!
-
comment
Comment #47522308
“Zero point” is how I saw it referred to in the literature, so that’s what I went with. I personally prefer to think of it as an offset, but I try to stick with terms folks are lik…
-
comment
Comment #47520400
Definitely could be, but in the time I spent talking to the 4-bit models in comparison to the 16-bit original it seemed surprisingly capable still. I do recommend benchmarking quan…
-
comment
Comment #47520361
Thank you! I was really surprised how robust models are to losing information. It seems wrong that they can be compressed so much and still function at all, never mind function qui…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47337387
Thanks for linking to my silly little quiz in the article! :)
-
comment
Comment #47157390
I wrote a tool called llmwalk ( https://github.com/samwho/llmwalk ) that’ll deterministically show you the likelihood the top N answers are for a given open model and prompt. No he…