Viewing profile — samjewell

> then pivoted to being, ah, its okay for it to be a terminator type entity. Isn’t that the opposite of what he’s saying? He’s saying it could become that powerful, and given that …

Is there any way to read this article without subscribing? I tried https://web.archive.org/web/20250506064408/https://www.natio... but I still hit the paywall.

> In fact, you should commit your LLM dialogs along with your code. Wholeheartedly agree with this. I think code review will evolve from "Review this code" to "Review this prompt t…

I work at Grafana. Can you say more about what specifically you don’t recommend?

What happened to the girl you had a crush on? Did your effort to distance yourself from computers bear any fruit in any way? Do you have any regrets with that part of your story?

I'm amazed that the author doesn't recommend Pair-programming as one of the techniques to avoid "Doing too much before looping in others" He mentions: > an engineer on a project sh…

Thanks

Does anyone have any data on what fraction of YC startups go on to ultimately succeed/fail, at each successive fundraise? And I guess *how* well or badly they succeed/fail? I'm par…

Perhaps we should invest some of these energies thinking about getting on our bicycles instead

I’ve worked my whole career in the UK (7 years software eng, plus a bit in other jobs). Sounds from your comment like you’ve had better experiences in other countries. Is that righ…

Thanks for the comments - they're already very useful. To explain our process: We have a single designer, and when designs are reviewed it's usually by one of the devs In the past …

Thanks for the comments - they're already very useful. To explain our process: We have a single designer, and when designs are reviewed it's usually by one of the devs In the past …

We're a product team of 6, in a company of 20 people. We've tried to implement design-review to be like code-review, but we're having limited success. We've talked about: - Reviewi…