Viewing profile — samegreatsleeve
samegreatsleeve
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 05, 2013, 10:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About samegreatsleeve
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #5652126
Britannica costs $5 a month. Their articles are excellent. A free source written by top philosphers is Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosphy. That should be the first hit. If Wikipedi…
-
comment
Comment #5648830
Understand that it isn't MY problem. I find it easy to avoid wikipedia because I know how to do things like -wikipedia. But I'm not the vulnerable population. Most people don't kno…
-
comment
Comment #5648314
What does "unhealthy" in this context mean? Aristocracy is the norm for human civilization. I don't get why people are so chicken little about it. When your citizens are disgusting…
-
comment
Comment #5646468
The experts aren't bing silenced, they just show up on the second page of google so get no hits. The first page will often have literally 5+ links to wikipedia, and those articles …
-
comment
Comment #5643152
So wikipedia is a low quality content farm that shows up for every google search and prevents actual expert pages from being seen--taking revenue and visibility from experts--while…
-
comment
Comment #5636936
[citation needed] wikipedia'd!
-
comment
Comment #5634099
Haha, I was thinking the same about you. If you're a troll I give you credit: you know exactly how to impersonate the stupidity of a Wikipedia true believer. Asking for citations w…
-
comment
Comment #5633805
Really. You're really going to use that logical fallacy to support the religion for which you are a true believer. The delicious irony of your hatred is that your point is so poorl…
-
comment
Comment #5633402
Absolutely none of your comment is true; it reflects an unexamined bias and a complete unfamiliarity with the depths of wikipedia, how wikipedia stands up to alternatives, and the …
-
comment
Comment #5629614
Britannica actually accepts user generated content. They are superior to wikipedia, however, in that they have credible experts vet the content. The complaint about wikipedia is th…
-
comment
Comment #5629593
Isn't non-notable knowledge still knowledge? They are only interested in a small slice of human knowledge by their own sated goals.
-
comment
Comment #5629578
It's inaccurate to say that wikipedia is fact checked or verified. The existence of a citation does not imply the existence of a fact check or a verification, or verifiability. Eve…
-
comment
Comment #5629550
Your comment is itself a negative, middlebrow dismissal. The OPs negativity is middlebrow precisely because it's accurate, but it's beating a dead horse. This means it gets up vote…
-
comment
Comment #5629539
The genealogists are always happy to share their data. It's part of the culture. There's no open source genealogy programmers because the young nerds that do open source dont care …
-
comment
Comment #5629172
So a soft DOS then. Not much of a solution, still fully exploitable.
-
comment
Comment #5629167
He didn't say cut off an IP address.
-
comment
Comment #5629156
Paper doesn't harm the environment. Most lumber from NA is carbon neutral at worst, carbon capturing at best
-
comment
Comment #5628139
That's like saying to get someone to stop punching you, just punch yourself. DOSing yourself to stop a DOS :/
-
comment
Comment #5627346
Some people have bad ears. Others have bad speakers/headphones. You are probably both if you really believe that.
-
comment
Comment #5562884
The Princess Bride is extremely popular among 20-40 year olds in the Anglosphere. Australia, Canada, USA, UK. This narrows down your search for the Dread Pirate Roberts to like 150…
-
comment
Comment #5543093
Retrograde amnesia doesn't impair implicit memory. Priming effects are still shown for amnesiac people. This means that you'll be able to relearn your skills much more rapidly the …
-
comment
Comment #5536279
You may be right about WISPs. I was referring to cellular networks and wired networks. I'm guessing the hurdle is still legal/political. I'm gonna look into this, thanks for the in…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #5536214
It's only a separate economy to the extent that it isn't instantly being converted back into some other currency. There is a genuine bitcoin economy, and it is centered around the …
-
comment
Comment #5536200
>Traders learn; they adjust with respect to risk. Ha ha ha ha No. Traders learn, and then they die , and are replaced by new traders, who haven't learned.