Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — samegreatsleeve

samegreatsleeve

HN member
Joined
Fri, Apr 05, 2013, 10:35 PM UTC
HN karma
32
Public activity
29 items

About samegreatsleeve

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #5652126

    Britannica costs $5 a month. Their articles are excellent. A free source written by top philosphers is Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosphy. That should be the first hit. If Wikipedi…

  2. comment
    Comment #5648830

    Understand that it isn't MY problem. I find it easy to avoid wikipedia because I know how to do things like -wikipedia. But I'm not the vulnerable population. Most people don't kno…

  3. comment
    Comment #5648314

    What does "unhealthy" in this context mean? Aristocracy is the norm for human civilization. I don't get why people are so chicken little about it. When your citizens are disgusting…

  4. comment
    Comment #5646468

    The experts aren't bing silenced, they just show up on the second page of google so get no hits. The first page will often have literally 5+ links to wikipedia, and those articles …

  5. comment
    Comment #5643152

    So wikipedia is a low quality content farm that shows up for every google search and prevents actual expert pages from being seen--taking revenue and visibility from experts--while…

  6. comment
    Comment #5636936

    [citation needed] wikipedia'd!

  7. comment
    Comment #5634099

    Haha, I was thinking the same about you. If you're a troll I give you credit: you know exactly how to impersonate the stupidity of a Wikipedia true believer. Asking for citations w…

  8. comment
    Comment #5633805

    Really. You're really going to use that logical fallacy to support the religion for which you are a true believer. The delicious irony of your hatred is that your point is so poorl…

  9. comment
    Comment #5633402

    Absolutely none of your comment is true; it reflects an unexamined bias and a complete unfamiliarity with the depths of wikipedia, how wikipedia stands up to alternatives, and the …

  10. comment
    Comment #5629614

    Britannica actually accepts user generated content. They are superior to wikipedia, however, in that they have credible experts vet the content. The complaint about wikipedia is th…

  11. comment
    Comment #5629593

    Isn't non-notable knowledge still knowledge? They are only interested in a small slice of human knowledge by their own sated goals.

  12. comment
    Comment #5629578

    It's inaccurate to say that wikipedia is fact checked or verified. The existence of a citation does not imply the existence of a fact check or a verification, or verifiability. Eve…

  13. comment
    Comment #5629550

    Your comment is itself a negative, middlebrow dismissal. The OPs negativity is middlebrow precisely because it's accurate, but it's beating a dead horse. This means it gets up vote…

  14. comment
    Comment #5629539

    The genealogists are always happy to share their data. It's part of the culture. There's no open source genealogy programmers because the young nerds that do open source dont care …

  15. comment
    Comment #5629172

    So a soft DOS then. Not much of a solution, still fully exploitable.

  16. comment
    Comment #5629167

    He didn't say cut off an IP address.

  17. comment
    Comment #5629156

    Paper doesn't harm the environment. Most lumber from NA is carbon neutral at worst, carbon capturing at best

  18. comment
    Comment #5628139

    That's like saying to get someone to stop punching you, just punch yourself. DOSing yourself to stop a DOS :/

  19. comment
    Comment #5627346

    Some people have bad ears. Others have bad speakers/headphones. You are probably both if you really believe that.

  20. comment
    Comment #5562884

    The Princess Bride is extremely popular among 20-40 year olds in the Anglosphere. Australia, Canada, USA, UK. This narrows down your search for the Dread Pirate Roberts to like 150…

  21. comment
    Comment #5543093

    Retrograde amnesia doesn't impair implicit memory. Priming effects are still shown for amnesiac people. This means that you'll be able to relearn your skills much more rapidly the …

  22. comment
    Comment #5536279

    You may be right about WISPs. I was referring to cellular networks and wired networks. I'm guessing the hurdle is still legal/political. I'm gonna look into this, thanks for the in…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #5536214

    It's only a separate economy to the extent that it isn't instantly being converted back into some other currency. There is a genuine bitcoin economy, and it is centered around the …

  25. comment
    Comment #5536200

    >Traders learn; they adjust with respect to risk. Ha ha ha ha No. Traders learn, and then they die , and are replaced by new traders, who haven't learned.