Viewing profile — sailfrog
sailfrog
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 07, 2011, 4:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sailfrog
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #5032530
We use a coding test as a part of the interview process for new developers and it works quite nicely. Note it is just one part of the process, though it can help sway a decision wh…
-
comment
Comment #4915926
Until the source site changes the URL, or the URL arguments, or the page structure, or the doctype, or the CSS selectors, or the element ids, or whatever it is you key on to ferret…
-
comment
Comment #4913097
The submission was meant to be humorous, sorry to disappoint. No matter how you slice it parsing HTML from a 3rd party site is a major hack, though this does however work nicely (i…
- story
-
comment
Comment #4912469
I have been working on this question for a long time and I think most people have been fooled into believing an incorrect answer. My research indicates that it's actually 41.
- story
-
comment
Comment #4871482
Because python devs look down on everybody :)
-
comment
Comment #4462473
It's a good feature idea (I implemented a similar one in my open source webmail application a few years ago, I called it "freeze folder") but to go as far as "Paradigm shifted. Gam…
-
comment
Comment #4462472
It's a good feature idea (I implemented a similar one in my open source webmail application a few years ago, I called it "freeze folder") but to go as far as "Paradigm shifted. Gam…
-
comment
Comment #4447006
I guess it really depends on your definition of irrelevant. Personally I have no problem with candidates who have a storied past, since I seriously doubt they have made as many ill…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #4446990
I agree with regard to full disclosure. The unfortunate reality is that what might normally be considered a past indiscretion can shred a potential candidate's chances at success, …
-
comment
Comment #4394808
Grunter owns Twitter
-
comment
Comment #4388990
grnthphhh!
-
comment
Comment #4388957
Regrunts. Brilliant!
- story
-
comment
Comment #3895703
I am not a fan of flash orders but a few nit-picks: - I believe you have to opt in to have your order flashed. You seem to be suggesting this is happening behind traders backs - On…
-
comment
Comment #3895677
Let's imagine you head over to the DMV over lunch to get your license renewed. Rather than have a line of people being served via FIFO they randomly pick who gets serviced next. Yo…
-
comment
Comment #3895572
The way I am reading these comments it would seem that HNers are more curious than idolizing. Personally I do not believe that the length of time in which an entity chooses to own …
-
comment
Comment #3895419
Insofar as Nanex is concerned remember they are attempting to sell you a product, so be aware of their motivations before swallowing any unsubstantiated assumptions. With that said…
-
comment
Comment #3895259
I'm not sure reg NMS allows this. Registered exchanges publish protected quotes that other venues are not allowed to trade through.
-
comment
Comment #3895234
Zerohedge can be entertaining but the objectivity of it' conclusions is dubious at best. As already stated in the OP, HFT firms place and cancel orders quickly. These charts show t…
-
comment
Comment #3865502
Hastymail
-
comment
Comment #3854348
"But HFT looks to me like they're just sucking little pieces out of everyone else's trades, while providing no value to society." This suggests that market participants of any type…
-
comment
Comment #3854175
The common way transaction fees are handled in US equity markets is called the "maker/taker" model. When a participant adds liquidity to the exchange order book, AND that order is …