Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — s73ver

s73ver

HN member
Joined
Mon, Apr 03, 2017, 4:34 PM UTC
HN karma
526
Public activity
784 items

About s73ver

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14993394

    When it rains, it pours, I guess.

  2. comment
    Comment #14993344

    No, it isn't. Not when many of their female employees were willing to leave the company, and when the existence of that manifesto would make their recruiting efforts much, much har…

  3. comment
    Comment #14993080

    Here's an article from someone who would have a much better grasp on the subject than you or I: http://blog.goldieblox.com/2017/08/open-letter-james-damore-... Here's another break…

  4. comment
    Comment #14991242

    This idea that one can only disagree with it because they haven't read it is extremely uncivil, and does nothing but attempt to shut down the discussion here.

  5. comment
    Comment #14991222

    Both of those theses are quite sexist, and no, neither one is appropriate for discussion in the workplace. Especially a workplace that wishes to appear as welcoming for all, not ju…

  6. comment
    Comment #14991171

    "No. His firing confirmed part of Demore's thesis; that Google has monoculture issues and sits in some sort of bubble." Google had to decide which they value more: Demore's manifes…

  7. comment
    Comment #14991091

    "By doing it in an anti-science, anti-evidence way" But they didn't. That man's argument was not science. It wasn't. There was absolutely no scientific evidence behind his argument…

  8. comment
    Comment #14991035

    "Healthcare, like, the mandatory profits for insurance companies?" Like the end to discrimination against pre-existing conditions. Like the end to yearly and lifetime caps on cover…

  9. comment
    Comment #14981789

    No, I got exactly what you wrote. I don't buy it, and I incredibly do not buy this bunk idea that the disagreements are entirely superficial. To those millions who would have lost …

  10. comment
    Comment #14981043

    Only if you're intellectually dishonest, or you've not been paying attention. For instance, how many parties are actively trying to suppress minority voters?

  11. comment
    Comment #14981019

    They're being downvoted because their point, and yours, is absolutely bunk. You pick one or two token things on which they agree, and ignore an entire host of issues on which they …

  12. comment
    Comment #14974704

    Part of the problem, I suspect, is that most startups only target cities, and those who live in them.

  13. comment
    Comment #14974695

    No. This both-sidesism is laughably wrong. There are extremely clear distinctions between the two parties. Anyone claiming they are the same is either intellectually lazy or corrup…

  14. comment
    Comment #14974673

    And how does that get me better internet access?

  15. comment
    Comment #14973034

    Saying "rewrite the app" is pure hyperbole. You have a few things to update, but that's it.

  16. comment
    Comment #14970674

    You don't see anything wrong with the company being it's own ghostwriter? The company, who is clearly going to agree with the contents that are charitable to itself?

  17. comment
    Comment #14963920

    You assign it. Everyone knows that there's going to be some of that; that's why it's called "work". But you have to make sure to spread it around as best you can, so that one perso…

  18. comment
    Comment #14963077

    While most of those boil down to the most common reason: Crappy management, I'm not seeing the second most common reason: Crappy pay (which is just another way that Crappy manageme…

  19. comment
    Comment #14960994

    Isn't that the problem, though? Bitcoin was supposed to be a medium of exchange. Cash for the internet, in other words. Investing means that people really aren't going to be doing …

  20. comment
    Comment #14959443

    I mean, I clearly do as that is my profession. And I really don't think the decision is between "nurse" and "software engineer".

  21. comment
    Comment #14952355

    The guy has just alienated over a third of the company. Likely any of the women on his team don't trust him anymore.

  22. comment
    Comment #14952342

    "While the author used dubious rhetorical tactics (e.g. stating scientific "facts" without citation), he was never hostile towards any one person or group of people." Most of the m…

  23. comment
    Comment #14952301

    But are they less interested just because? Or less interested because of things like Uber?

  24. comment
    Comment #14951378

    To re-examine why you rejected them, and see if other candidates were rejected for similar reasons or not. There are several studies that show that women and minorities are simply …

  25. comment
    Comment #14949924

    I am discussing real issues. He was using junk science and pseudoscience to justify his claims. That means he's not doing it in good faith, and is more likely than not using those …