Viewing profile — s73ver
s73ver
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 03, 2017, 4:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 526
- Public activity
- 784 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About s73ver
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14993394
When it rains, it pours, I guess.
-
comment
Comment #14993344
No, it isn't. Not when many of their female employees were willing to leave the company, and when the existence of that manifesto would make their recruiting efforts much, much har…
-
comment
Comment #14993080
Here's an article from someone who would have a much better grasp on the subject than you or I: http://blog.goldieblox.com/2017/08/open-letter-james-damore-... Here's another break…
-
comment
Comment #14991242
This idea that one can only disagree with it because they haven't read it is extremely uncivil, and does nothing but attempt to shut down the discussion here.
-
comment
Comment #14991222
Both of those theses are quite sexist, and no, neither one is appropriate for discussion in the workplace. Especially a workplace that wishes to appear as welcoming for all, not ju…
-
comment
Comment #14991171
"No. His firing confirmed part of Demore's thesis; that Google has monoculture issues and sits in some sort of bubble." Google had to decide which they value more: Demore's manifes…
-
comment
Comment #14991091
"By doing it in an anti-science, anti-evidence way" But they didn't. That man's argument was not science. It wasn't. There was absolutely no scientific evidence behind his argument…
-
comment
Comment #14991035
"Healthcare, like, the mandatory profits for insurance companies?" Like the end to discrimination against pre-existing conditions. Like the end to yearly and lifetime caps on cover…
-
comment
Comment #14981789
No, I got exactly what you wrote. I don't buy it, and I incredibly do not buy this bunk idea that the disagreements are entirely superficial. To those millions who would have lost …
-
comment
Comment #14981043
Only if you're intellectually dishonest, or you've not been paying attention. For instance, how many parties are actively trying to suppress minority voters?
-
comment
Comment #14981019
They're being downvoted because their point, and yours, is absolutely bunk. You pick one or two token things on which they agree, and ignore an entire host of issues on which they …
-
comment
Comment #14974704
Part of the problem, I suspect, is that most startups only target cities, and those who live in them.
-
comment
Comment #14974695
No. This both-sidesism is laughably wrong. There are extremely clear distinctions between the two parties. Anyone claiming they are the same is either intellectually lazy or corrup…
-
comment
Comment #14974673
And how does that get me better internet access?
-
comment
Comment #14973034
Saying "rewrite the app" is pure hyperbole. You have a few things to update, but that's it.
-
comment
Comment #14970674
You don't see anything wrong with the company being it's own ghostwriter? The company, who is clearly going to agree with the contents that are charitable to itself?
-
comment
Comment #14963920
You assign it. Everyone knows that there's going to be some of that; that's why it's called "work". But you have to make sure to spread it around as best you can, so that one perso…
-
comment
Comment #14963077
While most of those boil down to the most common reason: Crappy management, I'm not seeing the second most common reason: Crappy pay (which is just another way that Crappy manageme…
-
comment
Comment #14960994
Isn't that the problem, though? Bitcoin was supposed to be a medium of exchange. Cash for the internet, in other words. Investing means that people really aren't going to be doing …
-
comment
Comment #14959443
I mean, I clearly do as that is my profession. And I really don't think the decision is between "nurse" and "software engineer".
-
comment
Comment #14952355
The guy has just alienated over a third of the company. Likely any of the women on his team don't trust him anymore.
-
comment
Comment #14952342
"While the author used dubious rhetorical tactics (e.g. stating scientific "facts" without citation), he was never hostile towards any one person or group of people." Most of the m…
-
comment
Comment #14952301
But are they less interested just because? Or less interested because of things like Uber?
-
comment
Comment #14951378
To re-examine why you rejected them, and see if other candidates were rejected for similar reasons or not. There are several studies that show that women and minorities are simply …
-
comment
Comment #14949924
I am discussing real issues. He was using junk science and pseudoscience to justify his claims. That means he's not doing it in good faith, and is more likely than not using those …