Viewing profile — s0ss
s0ss
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 01, 2017, 8:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 222
- Public activity
- 80 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About s0ss
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49250206
yeah, I'm not sure what your goal is pedantically picking apart my argument when the subject at hand is clearly not "open source". love xkcd though. :P
-
comment
Comment #49250185
I vehemently disagree. There's no source and it's not open, the licenses are often abysmal too.
-
comment
Comment #49249946
open source gives you freedom to read/edit/learn from the source code. Open weights don't let you read/edit/learn from the source. open wights have more in common with traditional …
-
comment
Comment #49249464
You can choose to use the wrong words all you want. Doing so intentionally is an interesting choice.
-
comment
Comment #49249331
This is not open source; you mean open weight. These models are the antithesis of FOSS. Is it better than hosted models from other big labs? Yes, but not by much from a freedom per…
-
comment
Comment #49249207
Open source != open weight. Big difference and it bugs me that nobody seems to care about using the right words in only this context.
-
comment
Comment #49243460
He’s asking you to elaborate as to why you say it’s not a big deal. Claims with reasoned arguments are more productive. Otherwise you’re just shouting hot takes without any backing…
-
comment
Comment #49243279
They’re talking about having personas for different purposes. Very simplified Example: Only talking about topic XYZ over tor with good opsec; talking about topic ABC openly.
-
comment
Comment #49233998
No, it very much depends on the application, what you're trying to do. Different tools for different jobs. Don't conflate.
-
comment
Comment #49222742
To me, BYOC will always mean "bring your own computer", which is amusing in this context.
-
comment
Comment #49222204
I don’t have any data on that because chromium derivatives aren’t installed, haha. It’s not a matter of “does it work”. It’s philosophical.
-
comment
Comment #49222099
Inferior alternative
-
comment
Comment #49222084
Advertising companies shouldn’t be in the browser business. It’s a really bad conflict of interest. Chromium is a mistake. Firefox is pretty great. But IMO they have some poor ux d…
-
comment
Comment #49215107
The same companies who have allowed this to happen all stand to benefit from regulatory capture. Yup.
-
comment
Comment #49204698
Citation needed
-
comment
Comment #49201029
most people aren't hn readers. broadcast tv is far from useless in 2026, that's how many normies watch tv.
-
comment
Comment #49200945
advertising with extra steps stinks
-
comment
Comment #49181904
I choose to accept reality. Until someone can do it, it hasn’t been done. Once that happens, this will cease being vaporware. The bubble is filled with vapors and those who drank t…
-
comment
Comment #49092804
numbers are fun.
-
comment
Comment #49077064
Are clients and server FOSS? If so, advertise that. Personally, I’m not interested in another platform that isn’t.
-
comment
Comment #49071422
How's it "quite short sighted"? Are you saying the math _does_ make sense? if so, how?
-
comment
Comment #48908126
I think it’s worth pointing out that the “strategic partners” of this organization, those who fund this standard, have a commercial interest in selling curriculum materials based o…
-
comment
Comment #48907825
More like: _people_ still use linkedin?
-
comment
Comment #48763288
Consciousness?
-
comment
Comment #48074773
I have, maybe you should too. Other than stating it’s not a 501c3, I haven’t heard a compelling argument. I think it’s OK that Linus gets paid to do what he does. Everyone here def…