Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ryankemper

ryankemper

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 10:55 PM UTC
HN karma
539
Public activity
158 items

About ryankemper

You can reach me via e-mail at ryankemper dot cs at gmail

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #27012672

    As an operator you're always making a tradeoff between the "negatives" of a license and the "positives" enabled by the actual software. So for one example, the recent (bait and) sw…

  2. comment
    Comment #26988340

    > There’s nothing silly about a novel virus having greater abilities to overcome barriers when compared to other pathogens that humans have had years decades and centuries to devel…

  3. comment
    Comment #26988326

    > You are removing roughly 10% of the population in the U.S., or 2% worldwide. These numbers seem way too low if you're talking about the prevalence of people that have been expose…

  4. comment
    Comment #26988313

    > Seems like the simplest answer is just "actions that have reduced the spread of one disease have also reduced the spread of another, that's historically less widespread already."…

  5. comment
    Comment #26988279

    Actually, what you're saying is untrue. The overwhelming evidence shows that children spread COVID less than adults do. My favorite is this: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NE…

  6. comment
    Comment #26972648

    For context, in India there's about 27,000 deaths per day in a normal year (napkin math: 7.344 deaths per 1000 from https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/IND/india/death-rate , mul…

  7. comment
    Comment #26829188

    > OK, but you can make the same argument for COVID. It seems to me that the slides are at least comparing apples with apples. If you look at the rates of acute side effects to the …

  8. comment
    Comment #26829180

    That doesn't compare vaccination to naturalistic rates at all. It just gives rates of reinfection for those with antibodies versus without.

  9. comment
    Comment #26829164

    A coding camp is the opposite of hustling. It's called "bootcamp" for a reason - it's there to impose some structure for those who need it. Also bootcamp is very overhyped. There's…

  10. comment
    Comment #26803535

    What dataset are you referring to?

  11. comment
    Comment #26803460

    Second shot syndrome is apparently worse in the young (20's / 30's) due to the stronger immune response. I wasn't assuming that everyone who gets the syndrome would be asymp. but j…

  12. comment
    Comment #26800341

    > fwiw, new and better better technologies need to get used for the first time, eventually. No-one disputed that, I'm just pointing out that it is a very valid point for someone to…

  13. comment
    Comment #26800286

    > Difference is that I know person that got COVID in November and now has issues with memory. > I don't know a single person that has that after flue and cold - and those are with …

  14. comment
    Comment #26800244

    The fact that the vaccines create just a single spike protein and the real virus creates much more is actually one of the issues. First: does the rate at which the cells are made t…

  15. comment
    Comment #26800198

    (Not the one you responded to) I know what an mRNA vaccine is and the only clearcut answer is that "yes, obviously the long-tail risks of mRNA vaccines could outpace the long-tail …

  16. comment
    Comment #26800155

    > Also don't think the long-tail risk of an mRNA vaccine can be worse then COVID's long-tail risk. It absolutely could, and that should be self-evident. > Also pretty sure risk of …

  17. comment
    Comment #26800107

    We've never taken such an attitude for any other endemic respiratory pathogen in existence, and for good reason. It's completely absurd and ignores not only the important health be…

  18. comment
    Comment #26800043

    It is true; the PDF linked in the GC has to make a number of assumptions and is very obviously made from a point of bias (which does not invalidate its claims but warrants extra sc…

  19. comment
    Comment #26799982

    > The chance the disease kills you is 1 in 100 It's 6 in 1000 if you listen to the CDC; personally I think the real number is closer to 3 in 1000. That's not too far off from what …

  20. comment
    Comment #26799895

    Thanks. To avoid repeating myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26799734 TL;DR you can probably s/mRNA/adenovirus vector/g although I will grant that adenovirus vector seem…

  21. comment
    Comment #26799860

    > It's not dishonest. It's a very adequate answer to the over-simplifying claim above. I would disagree that calling it "rushed, experimental, and not necessary for [the original c…

  22. comment
    Comment #26799734

    Thanks for the important clarification; I didn't read closely enough. My argument was definitely tailored for the mRNA discussion, although the purpose was more to illustrate the b…

  23. comment
    Comment #26796816

    It's extra frustrating because organizations like the CDC get held to lower standards than anyone else. They can make a pronouncement recommending the use of face masks for SARS-Co…

  24. comment
    Comment #26796746

    I hear this line being trotted out all over - especially from the "experts" - and I find it nothing short of enraging. There is a difference between saying "an mRNA platform in gen…

  25. comment
    Comment #26796707

    > All these anti-vaxers talking about living in fear of a virus that has 98% survival rate Please cite a source here. Survival rate usually means IFR not CFR, and even the CDC's ow…