Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rwaldron

rwaldron

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 14, 2011, 5:39 PM UTC
HN karma
105
Public activity
67 items

About rwaldron

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #17828833

    That's correct, but only half correct :) Johnny-Five programs can run on board any SBC that runs Linux and can support Node.js. For those platforms, GPIO and serial bus interfaces …

  2. comment
    Comment #16349285

    "linting" is subjective, preferential—not required. Python built linting into the language itself and it's super annoying.

  3. comment
    Comment #16349260

    > behaviour is well defined. True, and we could go one step further: it's unambiguously defined, with invariant rules that can be used to prove a conformant implementation.

  4. comment
    Comment #16349231

    > Looks like it's been fixed in ES5 That was published 9 years ago.

  5. comment
    Comment #16349221

    9999999999999999 > Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER === true JavaScript numbers are IEEE754 double precision floating point format.

  6. comment
    Comment #16349134

    PL = Programming Language

  7. comment
    Comment #11232525

    Actually, 4 years ago and then again 3 years ago I said it was a total disaster. I have mountains of email reports from an audit of the project.

  8. comment
    Comment #10269027

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX7wtNOkuHo

  9. comment
    Comment #9422233

    You're conflating "JavaScript the programming language" with "DOM, the awful sack of shit". Don't do that.

  10. comment
    Comment #9421268

    I absolutely agree with this. Several years ago I did the same exercise with Zepto, which definitively disproved its compatibility claim.

  11. comment
    Comment #9420517

    Yes, performance comparisons, but those could've been measurements of no-op versions of functions by the same name.

  12. comment
    Comment #9420504

    There isn't a single test for this project. How can its claims of jQuery-alike-ness be supported? Tests, or it doesn't exist.

  13. comment
    Comment #7351964

    If Facebook made use of smart OCAP practices, none of that would be possible. Use of object identity as a "security key" would prevent code that doesn't have access to the "key" ob…

  14. comment
    Comment #7267691

    Boooorrrrring.

  15. comment
    Comment #7160378

    Open Wash.

  16. comment
    Comment #7160372

    Everyone loves a bit of HN-google-twitter juice for publishing some controversial anti-jQuery diatribe. yawn

  17. comment
    Comment #7156978

    No, they mean Node.bind(), it's a Polymer proposal.

  18. comment
    Comment #7156965

    > To be perfectly honest, I think it's a bit of a reach to suggest that I "probably need jQuery" because strict mode limitations caused problems within jQuery once upon a time (lik…

  19. comment
    Comment #7156933

    I wasn't being snarky, I was making playful jokes :P

  20. comment
    Comment #7154796

    MooTools modified built-in objects in future hostile ways. Do you miss that too?

  21. comment
    Comment #7154696

    So... browserify is like http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131111220942/harrypo... ?

  22. comment
    Comment #7154685

    > These aren't really what the author claims. As the author, I can assure you they are what I claim them to be: Points in the source code that identify some issue in some browser. …

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #7154051

    If you like spirit, you'll love this: https://gist.github.com/rwaldron/8720084#file-reasons-md

  25. comment
    Comment #7154035

    Take only what you need https://github.com/jquery/jquery#modules