Viewing profile — rwaldron
rwaldron
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 14, 2011, 5:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 105
- Public activity
- 67 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rwaldron
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17828833
That's correct, but only half correct :) Johnny-Five programs can run on board any SBC that runs Linux and can support Node.js. For those platforms, GPIO and serial bus interfaces …
-
comment
Comment #16349285
"linting" is subjective, preferential—not required. Python built linting into the language itself and it's super annoying.
-
comment
Comment #16349260
> behaviour is well defined. True, and we could go one step further: it's unambiguously defined, with invariant rules that can be used to prove a conformant implementation.
-
comment
Comment #16349231
> Looks like it's been fixed in ES5 That was published 9 years ago.
-
comment
Comment #16349221
9999999999999999 > Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER === true JavaScript numbers are IEEE754 double precision floating point format.
-
comment
Comment #16349134
PL = Programming Language
-
comment
Comment #11232525
Actually, 4 years ago and then again 3 years ago I said it was a total disaster. I have mountains of email reports from an audit of the project.
-
comment
Comment #10269027
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX7wtNOkuHo
-
comment
Comment #9422233
You're conflating "JavaScript the programming language" with "DOM, the awful sack of shit". Don't do that.
-
comment
Comment #9421268
I absolutely agree with this. Several years ago I did the same exercise with Zepto, which definitively disproved its compatibility claim.
-
comment
Comment #9420517
Yes, performance comparisons, but those could've been measurements of no-op versions of functions by the same name.
-
comment
Comment #9420504
There isn't a single test for this project. How can its claims of jQuery-alike-ness be supported? Tests, or it doesn't exist.
-
comment
Comment #7351964
If Facebook made use of smart OCAP practices, none of that would be possible. Use of object identity as a "security key" would prevent code that doesn't have access to the "key" ob…
-
comment
Comment #7267691
Boooorrrrring.
-
comment
Comment #7160378
Open Wash.
-
comment
Comment #7160372
Everyone loves a bit of HN-google-twitter juice for publishing some controversial anti-jQuery diatribe. yawn
-
comment
Comment #7156978
No, they mean Node.bind(), it's a Polymer proposal.
-
comment
Comment #7156965
> To be perfectly honest, I think it's a bit of a reach to suggest that I "probably need jQuery" because strict mode limitations caused problems within jQuery once upon a time (lik…
-
comment
Comment #7156933
I wasn't being snarky, I was making playful jokes :P
-
comment
Comment #7154796
MooTools modified built-in objects in future hostile ways. Do you miss that too?
-
comment
Comment #7154696
So... browserify is like http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131111220942/harrypo... ?
-
comment
Comment #7154685
> These aren't really what the author claims. As the author, I can assure you they are what I claim them to be: Points in the source code that identify some issue in some browser. …
-
comment
Comment #7154295
<3 lol
-
comment
Comment #7154051
If you like spirit, you'll love this: https://gist.github.com/rwaldron/8720084#file-reasons-md
-
comment
Comment #7154035
Take only what you need https://github.com/jquery/jquery#modules