Viewing profile — runxiyu
runxiyu
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 02, 2024, 5:18 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 30
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About runxiyu
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47956303
I think there is a lot of merit to this argument, however, FastCGI defers to CGI/1.1 for `PATH_INFO`, etc., which is lossy as it must be URL-decoded and therefore cannot represent …
- story
-
comment
Comment #47512779
Actually, yeah doesn't seem realistic to me at all
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
story
Show HN: Custom Git-receive-pack implementation
Chuck some SHA-1 repositories at the endpoint: git push git://lindenii.org/ HEAD:refs/heads/change-this-name (I wrote a pure-Go git receive pack implementation and wanna test it ou…
-
comment
Comment #47262498
Current features: Parsing configs Object ID and hash algorithms (SHA-256, SHA-1) Object type enums Object representation types Object header parsing Parsing objects Serializing obj…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47246007
How is this related to the AI bubble?
-
comment
Comment #45655357
Using -X POST is often wrong as it "changes the actual method string in the HTTP request [... and] does not change behavior accordingly" (Stenberg, 2015). Although, it is correct f…
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #43840101
A git forge
- story
-
comment
Comment #43809769
That cover image looks familiar.
-
comment
Comment #43670813
Probably not
-
comment
Comment #43670796
Anubis et al. are also looking into alternative algorithms. There seems to be consensus that SHA-256 PoW is not appropriate