Viewing profile — rumpelstilz18
rumpelstilz18
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 04, 2021, 9:45 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rumpelstilz18
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29108804
"We trust browsers with passwords to everything in our lives, like our bank details." No we don't. I use C&P from my PW Manager (Enpass). For your Bank you should have your own Bro…
-
comment
Comment #28961166
Put it on the Bitcoin blockchain. Bitcoin wont be around anymore but I am sure the chain will still be somewhere.
-
comment
Comment #28961133
"After all, we'd rather have that cash in a bank account than tied up in inventory." The "We" includes you. And it is inherent in our society what we add layer of layer of complexi…
-
comment
Comment #28861454
"The only realistic solution to this problem is to move the audio and video rendering server-side and stream final output to clients from the edge." Too expensive, requires too muc…
-
comment
Comment #28807618
That is BS. The opposite is true. Nations that see women just as breeding vessels outbreed the west. This is one of the reasons why the West/US failed in Afghanistan.
-
story
Creator of FGC-9 3D printed gun claimed dead
Der Spiegel, a German magazine reports that law enforcement identified him as a German citizen with Turkish roots. A search warrant did not provide any evidence. He was found dead …
-
comment
Comment #28766469
> Knowing just slightly more about the value of your car than a potential buyer can make it impossible to sell it > This means that the owner of a carefully maintained, never-abuse…
-
comment
Comment #28755633
"How can a book from 1982 "debunk" experimental evidence that has been obtained 20-39 years later? It cannot." Well, it talks exactly about the points you mentioned and that are li…
-
comment
Comment #28750255
3.1 Isotope effects 3.2 Explaining differences in stereoisomer scents 3.3 The sulfurous smell of boranes Most of the critiques are debunked in the book from 1982 that I linked.
-
comment
Comment #28749735
1. There is no proof in science. But now there is disprove? Link please. 2. The other book, while very old, addresses most critique points. 3. The US military has successful applic…
-
comment
Comment #28745620
Okay, I am wrong. Two famous scientists vs. an idiot on HN
-
comment
Comment #28744858
"Sounds reasonable." No, it does not. Your eye has no receptors to detect a chair, a stone or a dog. They detect a spectrum. Why should the nose work different? "infrared theory of…