Viewing profile — ruilov
ruilov
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Mar 08, 2015, 4:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 44
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ruilov
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48493225
the smartest people see AI as an incredible tool that enhances their productivity.
-
comment
Comment #48049029
I'd like to see the base rate. Ie were there similar bets at similar times when Trump did not make an announcement
-
comment
Comment #43044683
Look up Jeff Yass. Mega donor to Trump and large shareholder in ByteDance.
-
comment
Comment #43044668
Only before Jan 19th and if a sale was in progress. After Jan 19th the law went into effect, and whatever Trump said or wrote in executive order became legally irrelevant
-
comment
Comment #42743605
from the opinion: "[Tiktok] further argue that the Act is underinclusive as to the Government’s data protection concern, raising doubts as to whether the Government is actually pur…
-
comment
Comment #42742866
it may be toothless but will they have an effect? You're Apple or Google's lawyer - the CEO asks, should I take Tiktok down from the app store. What do you say? Otoh there's a law …
-
comment
Comment #42742762
part D. "The record before us adequately supports the conclusion that Congress would have passed the challenged provisions based on the data collection justification alone"
-
comment
Comment #42742693
agreed
-
comment
Comment #42742645
they talk more about the motivations of the law in part D. The "exclusion" referred to in this quote is not the exclusion of tiktok. The court is responding to one of the arguments…
-
comment
Comment #42741634
I'd use the term 'originalism' rather 'textualism', but you have a point. For 1st amendment cases, the court hasn't (yet) tried to use their new fangled originalist methodologies. …
-
comment
Comment #42741459
they found some of the arguments compelling and acknowledged that the law may burden free speech. But they also found that the law is not about speech, it's about corporate ownersh…
-
comment
Comment #42741056
The replies here seem slightly off base. The Court acknowledges that 1s amm. free speech issues are at play. A law can regulate non-expressive activity (corporate ownership) while …
-
comment
Comment #12888367
RBN energy has really detailed analysis: https://rbnenergy.com/ . It assumes some level of familiarity, so it's not for everyone.
-
comment
Comment #12888339
Normally people use the term "demand" to mean a curve, which is a function of price. In an efficient market (a good approximation for the oil market), the price solves for the equi…