Viewing profile — rsc
rsc
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 8:18 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,294
- Public activity
- 329 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rsc
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48420918
As a long-time open-source maintainer, I find all the second-guessing and armchair psychoanalysis here (not just in this comment, all over HN) about Tridge's motivations, state of …
-
comment
Comment #47693303
The $20K was the total across all the files scanned, not just the one with the bug.
-
comment
Comment #47431376
Worth noting these were not written as rules of programming generally but rules specifically targeted at complexity. They are lifted from the "Complexity" section of Rob's "Notes o…
-
comment
Comment #46905829
Raises hand.
-
comment
Comment #45376454
FWIW, the versions are not semver but they do follow a defined and regular version schema: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models#model-versions .
-
comment
Comment #44911216
[Also posted to Lobsters: https://lobste.rs/s/ms94ja/what_is_go_proxy_even_doing#c_vz2... ] I apologize for the traffic. We clearly need to look at the “thundering herd” you are ob…
-
comment
Comment #44358503
This is a strange and dangerous thing to try to do from assembly. In particular, all these details about write barriers being hand-coded in the assembly are subject to change from …
-
comment
Comment #43974015
The parent comment is the first time I've said anything publicly (it has only been a few weeks). I didn't feel like it needed an announcement, but since it came up, it seemed worth…
-
comment
Comment #43973388
Officially, I have left the Go team too; I started on a new team at Google a few weeks ago. I still use Go quite a bit, I still talk to people on the Go team regularly, and you wil…
-
comment
Comment #43762765
Those are semantically different (one is nil and one is not) but neither allocates.
-
comment
Comment #43558542
Not sure what the betrayal is? He contributed a quote for yesterday's post. https://tailscale.com/blog/tailscale-enterprise-plan-9-suppo...
-
comment
Comment #43558516
We had to do some Plan 9 work, which makes sense when doing something new, but the actual Tailscale implementation is far _less_ work than for other Unixes.
-
comment
Comment #42988576
https://docs.rs/txtar/latest/txtar/
-
comment
Comment #42634428
In the link in the parent comment. :-)
-
comment
Comment #41974251
People who go install it get an error that it's not a valid source tree at all.
-
comment
Comment #41971076
While you can create and build a local package with U+FE0E in its file name, you cannot create or download a module using that character in a file name. So you could run this attac…
-
comment
Comment #41882801
No. It's just Go assembly. (It happens to be a Plan 9-derived syntax, but we call it Go assembly.) See https://go.dev/doc/asm .
-
comment
Comment #41141029
I replied to the other copy of this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41136122 .
-
comment
Comment #41141002
This is definitely not true. "Inside of Google" would have been just linux/amd64 for a very long time. Now it includes linux/arm64 too, but that port happened before Google needed …
-
comment
Comment #41140991
If you just want to run Go programs on Alpine, it works fine. (I put some effort in back in Go 1.21 to make sure that the downloaded binary toolchains for Linux even work fine on A…
-
comment
Comment #41140963
Happy to hear that. Still going to write and think. :-)
-
comment
Comment #41140958
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek1yjc9sSag&list=PLrwpzH1_9u... I don't intend to make more of those, but that was a lot of fun.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #41140924
Me too!
-
comment
Comment #41140922
The wording may be a joke but the concept is real and widely used.