Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — rramadass

rramadass

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 04, 2018, 1:02 PM UTC
HN karma
5,555
Public activity
3,760 items

About rramadass

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rramadass

===== The Problem: Realism vs. Idealism =====

“Do you know, I sometimes catch myself wishing that I, too, were blind to the facts of life and only knew its fancies and illusions. They’re wrong, all wrong, of course, and contrary to reason; but in the face of them my reason tells me, wrong and most wrong, that to dream and live illusions gives greater delight. And after all, delight is the wage for living. Without delight, living is a worthless act. To labour at living and be unpaid is worse than to be dead. He who delights the most lives the most, and your dreams and unrealities are less disturbing to you and more gratifying than are my facts to me.”

He shook his head slowly, pondering.

“I often doubt, I often doubt, the worthwhileness of reason. Dreams must be more substantial and satisfying. Emotional delight is more filling and lasting than intellectual delight; and, besides, you pay for your moments of intellectual delight by having the blues. Emotional delight is followed by no more than jaded senses which speedily recuperate. I envy you, I envy you.”

He stopped abruptly, and then on his lips formed one of his strange quizzical smiles, as he added:

“It’s from my brain I envy you, take notice, and not from my heart. My reason dictates it. The envy is an intellectual product. I am like a sober man looking upon drunken men, and, greatly weary, wishing he, too, were drunk.”

“Or like a wise man looking upon fools and wishing he, too, were a fool,” I laughed.

“Quite so,” he said. “You are a blessed, bankrupt pair of fools. You have no facts in your pocketbook.”

“Yet we spend as freely as you,” was Maud Brewster’s contribution.

“More freely, because it costs you nothing.”

“And because we draw upon eternity,” she retorted.

“Whether you do or think you do, it’s the same thing. You spend what you haven’t got, and in return you get greater value from spending what you haven’t got than I get from spending what I have got, and what I have sweated to get.”

-- Wolf Larsen from The Sea-Wolf by Jack London.

===== The Solution: Egoless engagement with every moment =====

One should become aware of one’s deluded notion in which one thinks that "I belong to these objects of the world and my life depends upon them. I cannot live without them and they cannot exist without me, either" [here objects can be anything that the mind latches onto i.e. animate/inanimate/thoughts/memories/etc.]. Then by profound enquiry, one contemplates "I do not belong to these objects, nor do these objects belong to me" [i.e. the difference between the experiencer, the object experienced and the experience itself]. Thus abandoning the ego-sense through intense contemplation, one should playfully engage oneself in the [everyday] actions that happen naturally [whether due to environment or self-initiated], but with the heart and mind ever cool and tranquil. Such an abandonment of the ego-sense and the conditioning is known as the contemplative egolessness.

Live in the present, with your consciousness externalized momentarily [i.e. egolessly immersed in the activity for however short/long a time period] but without any effort [i.e. without fixating on the outcome]; when the mind stops linking itself to the past and to the future, it becomes no-­mind. If from moment to moment your mind dwells [only] on what is and drops it effortlessly at once [before moving on to something else], the mind becomes no-­mind, full of purity.

They who, though remaining established in equilibrium, do not let their organs function naturally as long as the body is alive, are obstinate and stubborn people. As long as there is sesame there is oil; as long as there is the body, there are the different moods also. He who rebels against the states that the body is naturally subject to, cuts space to pieces with a sword [i.e. a futile and foolish endeavour]. The equilibrium of yoga is for the mind, not for the organs of action and their states. As long as the body lasts, one should let the organs of action perform their proper function [naturally; without desire/intent/volition], though the intellect and the senses remain in a state of equanimity. Such is the law of nature, to which even the gods are subject.

-- The Yoga Vasistha translated by Swami Venkatesananda.

=====

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49253748

    Right; the links i provided above explain it in more detail. WinRT is made up of component dlls and therefore exposes functional interface bundles. But the implementation of these …

  2. comment
    Comment #49252418

    Nice. I should have inferred that you were talking about Racket since some of the papers you had listed were Scheme related. Gradual Typing and similar powerful type systems are no…

  3. comment
    Comment #49245973

    Thank You and Appreciate it very much! The 1st, 4th and 7th papers look especially interesting. I think in order to appreciate DbC (gradual typing is whole another beast altogether…

  4. comment
    Comment #49240812

    Please add any interviews/articles/videos by the recipients about their work. I found this for Professor Deepak Dhar; 'Earthquakes, avalanches and market crashes have some things i…

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #49237262

    Can you share the links to all the papers that you refer to?

  7. comment
    Comment #49231899

    > For example, what unique need does a production assertion API satisfy that a normal conditional throw does not? See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49231133 An "assert" is f…

  8. comment
    Comment #49231764

    > Asserts ... the condition is supposed to be impossible to be false, just not provable by the type system Very nicely said!

  9. comment
    Comment #49231594

    The ASSERT (note caps) macro in Microsoft MFC library does this. It uses a "INT 3" instruction (x86/x64) via "AfxDebugBreak" to invoke the debugger. Since the above is a well-known…

  10. comment
    Comment #49230084

    Ha, Ha ... I have pointed to previous discussions with other HN users where the logic and rationale behind my "say so" are given. If you actually cared to read them you will find q…

  11. comment
    Comment #49229635

    You are very right. With linker maps, debug symbol files etc. we can get a good handle on what went wrong. > People would often leave some memory areas (typically circular buffers)…

  12. comment
    Comment #49229062

    Not this again ... Assertions should only be thought of as predicates on state space to ensure program correctness. Everything else is just a corollary. Some relevant past comments…

  13. comment
    Comment #49228869

    What are you talking about? I already explained it in the first part of my above comment here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49132199 Here it is replicated again; You have …

  14. comment
    Comment #49228793

    You don't have to lie or play-up/play-down the language; just say it as it is with no painting of dragons and fear-mongering. It is just another language and not rocket science.

  15. comment
    Comment #49223412

    AFAIK, the first design for implementation of vtables was by Bjarne Stroustrup in his paper Multiple Inheritance for C++ in 1986/1987. Pdf at https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESaw…

  16. comment
    Comment #49221846

    One more addition. There is often a distinction made between "language ABI" and "library ABI" in documentation which is highly confusing. The answer is: library API + compiler ABI …

  17. comment
    Comment #49220409

    I am glad that you found my comments useful. I use HN as my "blog" and generally include references to books/papers/articles as a pointer to further information on a topic. You wil…

  18. comment
    Comment #49220220

    > All Windows APIs since Vista are delivered via COM. Nope, This right here tells me you do not have much actual programming experience in Win32/Win64 apis nor of Windows Internals…

  19. comment
    Comment #49218713

    And yet you make such statements ;-) I often see on HN these sorts of comments whenever C++ is brought up and it really needs to stop. It is wrong, adds no value to the discussion …

  20. comment
    Comment #49218586

    What are you talking about? None of it is relevant to the point i am making. Also you do not need COM to program in C/C++ directly on Windows API since they are all C interfaces an…

  21. comment
    Comment #49214519

    I said " WinRT/.NET based managed languages/runtimes/libraries/frameworks" implying that it is the higher-level constructs that are used by app developers. If you were to interview…

  22. comment
    Comment #49214194

    Oh come on; that is BS and you know it. It is complex/complicated/baroque but for the power, flexibility, real-world-usage that it provides it is worth the effort. The mistake that…

  23. comment
    Comment #49213885

    Not directly by app developers. Everybody uses only WinRT/.NET based managed languages/runtimes/libraries/frameworks etc.

  24. comment
    Comment #49213442

    This technique is often used for security-sensitive projects involving binary protection, obfuscation etc. Program Obfuscation via ABI Debiasing (pdf) - https://www.google.com/goto…

  25. comment
    Comment #49212999

    Asking questions is always a good thing so don't worry about it. It makes us think and check our own understanding too, so we also learn something :-) A nice succinct post by Pavel…