Viewing profile — rpiguy
rpiguy
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 4:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,358
- Public activity
- 545 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rpiguy
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46920468
You can turn off a lot of the Civ 4 flash and it will feel more like Civ III. But to each his own. Civ 4 was the first one that really, really hooked me.
-
comment
Comment #46714173
This also will end up in the courts and the Supreme Court has long taken the 4th amendment seriously. Conservatives included. I expect this to be struck down.
-
comment
Comment #46674087
This is possible… but surely it will be Linux with a walled garden on top. The first clue will be a version of the Xbox running an OS with this model.
-
comment
Comment #46673900
I don’t wholly agree with that statement. He repeatedly asked for people to remain peaceful in the run up to J6. Even in his infamous 70 minute speech on the day of (which by the w…
-
comment
Comment #46673680
The earths’ resources are finite and we are in a competition for them. Technology and AI make the race for energy even more intense. If your country was as large as the US or China…
-
comment
Comment #46673601
Democracy is incredibly hard. If you start believing you can’t get along then society just turns into a rush to slam the Overton window shut on your opposition. Don’t give up hope.…
-
comment
Comment #46673180
Yes the US has the same rich people in charge but the President is willing to defy them. He defied them on tariffs and secure arctic access and mineral rights probably align with t…
-
comment
Comment #46672777
* * *
-
comment
Comment #46672655
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes, but they were morons No, not without an amendment allowing a third term, but even if there were an amendment probably still a No because he is too old and his …
-
comment
Comment #46672555
That’s not how physics works. The amount of energy needed to get two tons of vehicle to move from rest is enormous and that energy was transferred to a human body. The force of a t…
-
comment
Comment #46672480
The US would likely not have to fire a single shot. NATO would likely do nothing substantive. No economic repercussions. If anything this is a wake up call for Europe to come to gr…
-
comment
Comment #46672265
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46671854
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46671728
Of course it was in our interests to do so. No empire acts otherwise. We do not own the world, but we do own the worlds reserve currency, largest economy, are the guarantors of saf…
-
comment
Comment #46671448
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46671201
The US wouldn’t attack in an invasion. It would simply start building bases - it doesn’t need the south of Greenland. Just southern enough for a port that can stay open. If we buil…
-
comment
Comment #46671108
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46671093
Can you please leave this comment on all the posts that state “we need to protest” or “look at the mad king” I don’t see any explanation or opportunity for curious conversation. Wh…
-
comment
Comment #46670982
You are correct I was wrong. Comment corrected.
-
comment
Comment #46670553
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46670456
It’s a pure political discussion. It will get flagged by enough people who don’t want to see politics to remove it from the page.
-
comment
Comment #46670234
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46670220
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46670167
You illustrate my point exactly - we are all awful colonialists. No one has a moral claim on Greenland.
-
comment
Comment #46670144
[flagged]