Viewing profile — rowanG077
rowanG077
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 04, 2019, 2:27 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,494
- Public activity
- 3,877 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About rowanG077
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49195331
If your game fits in the bounds of N64 hardware it makes perfect sense IMO. You basically get virtually all modern platforms for free. Much easier than wrestling with all the moder…
-
comment
Comment #49136122
You can purchase much cheaper TB to pcie converts in china. You add some generic 12v power and you're done.
-
comment
Comment #49066630
Are you really being so obtuse? Of course in real code you might use the error. For printing, forwarding it to a logging frame or anything else. The point is the error does not gua…
-
comment
Comment #49066280
Did you ever use go? ``` package main import ( "errors" "fmt" ) func getMessage() (string, error) { return "DO NOT INSPECT", errors.New("something went wrong") } func main() { msg,…
-
comment
Comment #49065827
Unwrap is an explicit action. Checking an error is usually just forgotten. No unwrap can enter your code without the dev being accutely aware of it.
-
comment
Comment #49065747
It does that, yeah. But my experience mostly in codex with gpt 5.5 and 5.6 is that if you micromanage it enough you can get clear code. It just gets really annoying to repeatedly d…
-
comment
Comment #49055669
I program mostly in Rust, Haskell and Python nowadays. I indeed would love to go gc-less dependently typed. But I work in a team where the code I build is expected to be maintained…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49052474
I agree. Rust does not go far enough imo. Still catching most memory problems at compile time is still much superior.
-
comment
Comment #49051619
Something that is important to me is that it's caught at compile time. A memory issue is a logic bug. Fil-c simply moves that from undefined behavior/security issue/incorrectness t…
-
comment
Comment #49022169
Get real, you think LLMs got to where they are by training on 80 year old works? Your point is technically true, just basically irrelevant for LLM training.
-
comment
Comment #49014753
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48998330
I really don't think that's true. Of course after the fact a counter example looks easy. Because look at it, it's obviously that it doesn't work. But that disregards the process of…
-
comment
Comment #48984744
These models are not copies, distillation is simply a part in the pipeline. suggesting that the Chinese models are full copies through distillation is simply wrong. Just because th…
-
comment
Comment #48976333
Does anything truly better exist? I'm not a mathematician but I did use Rocq and Lean during university. And I found lean to be better.
-
comment
Comment #48951985
Ah yes, because if a person agrees with anything a chinese company does it must be because they love Xi. Get real. Munching of the top student in a class is clearly prohibited. Dis…
-
comment
Comment #48940996
Given that model distillation has existed since the early days of the current AI boom, and no robust defense has been demonstrated, the available evidence does not support your the…
-
comment
Comment #48940153
Distillation is not an attack. It simply a way to train a model. Not doing it when you are behind is akin to snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48939483
This is just not true. Not even electricity or hell water is globally available.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48884592
That someone needs to vent is not proof of anything. People get their panties twisted for the tiniest things. I would expect that if Andrew had a real valid reason than it would ap…
-
comment
Comment #48884471
There is no C/C++ static analyzer that can guarantee what rust does: full memory safety.
-
comment
Comment #48883635
Nothing superficial about 120K USD donations. I have personally seen nothing but good vibes coming from Bun to Zig and Andrew. Re-writing is not "throwing under the bus" you make i…
-
comment
Comment #48873935
I'm sorry that I don't agree with you that a out of touch board of directors or shareholders are better from the get go than Musk.